Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Satyavathi, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Satyavathi, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Satyavathi, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Published in Crop Sci. 44:1839-1846 (2004).
© 2004 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

GENOMICS, MOLECULAR GENETICS & BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effects of Growth Regulators on In Vitro Plant Regeneration in Durum Wheat

V. V. Satyavathia, P. P. Jauharb,*, E. M. Eliasa and M. B. Raoa

a Dep. of Statistics, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
b USDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Lab., Fargo, ND 58105

* Corresponding author (prem.jauhar{at}ndsu.nodak.edu).

Work on improvement of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) using tools of biotechnology is limited. Development of a reliable in vitro plant regeneration procedure for this important cereal is a prerequisite for its improvement by genetic transformation. Here, we report the effects of three growth regulators (GRs), 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), and dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), on callus induction and plant regeneration from scutellum cultures of four commercial durum cultivars: Ben, Maier, Munich, and Lebsock. Callus induction was obtained from isolated scutella cultured on modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium. After 4 wk of callus induction, all calli were plated on MS basal medium for regeneration. The regenerated plantlets were fertile, maintained the normal chromosome number (2n = 4x = 28) and structure as revealed by fluorescent genomic in situ hybridization (fl-GISH), and showed no apparent somaclonal variation. Genotype and callus induction medium played a dominant role in plantlet regeneration. Dicamba proved the best GR for inducing compact callus and also gave the highest proportion (0.16) of regenerated plants across the four cultivars. Overall, Maier gave the highest proportion (0.27) of plantlet regeneration when dicamba at 2.0 mg L–1 concentration was used for initial callus induction. These results will facilitate genetic transformation work with durum wheat.

Abbreviations: fl-GISH, fluorescent genomic in situ hybridization • GR, growth regulator • MS, Murashige and Skoog


Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2004 44: 1507-1510. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.