HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Crop Science Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Butruille, D. V. Articles by Coors, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Butruille, D. V. Articles by Coors, J. G. Agricola Articles by Butruille, D. V. Articles by Coors, J. G. Related Collections Germplasm Enhancement Crop Genetics Maize

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Response to Selection and Genetic Drift in Three Populations Derived from the Golden Glow Maize Population

^a Monsanto Company, Ankeny, IA
^b Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
^c Dep. of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

^* Corresponding author (jgcoors{at}facstaff.wisc.edu).

Reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) in maize (Zea mays L.) is used to develop populations with superior combining ability, and it is usually assumed that these populations must be genetically distinct for RRS to be effective. Starting from two randomly derived subpopulations, GG(A) and GG(B), of the open-pollinated maize population ‘Golden Glow’ (GGC0), we conducted six cycles of full-sib RRS for grain yield and moisture. Our objectives were to (i) document selection response; (ii) evaluate inter and intrapopulation genetic diversity; and (iii) review selection response relative to gene action, heterosis, inbreeding, and genetic drift. We performed a generation means analysis (GMA) using GG(A), GG(B), and a third population of Golden Glow developed by 21 cycles of mass selection for prolificacy, GG(MP). Field performance was evaluated at four environments in Wisconsin. We analyzed allele frequency changes using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs). Selection response for grain yield of GG(A) x GG(B) population crosses was 5.3 g plant^–1 cycle^–1. Grain moisture and root lodging decreased by –0.5% cycle^–1 and –5.2% cycle^–1, while prolificacy increased by 0.03 ears cycle^–1. After six cycles of RRS, GG(A) and GG(B) diverged genetically from each other, as well as from GG(MP)C21 and Golden Glow. Gene diversity within GG(A) and GG(B) decreased. However, total gene diversity over both GG(A) and GG(B) did not change over cycles of RRS. Genetic drift did not appear to seriously impede selection response. Most of the selection response, regardless of trait, selection method, or subpopulation, was attributed to additive genetic effects.

Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphisms • GG, Golden Glow • GMA, generation means analysis • RRS, reciprocal recurrent selection • SSR, simple sequence repeats

Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2004 44: 1507-1510. [Full Text]