Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass Management
Right arrow Turfgrass Pesticides
Right arrow Turfgrass
Published in Crop Sci. 44:1323-1329 (2004).
© 2004 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

TURFGRASS SCIENCE

St. Augustinegrass Response to Plant Growth Retardants

Lambert B. McCartya,*, Jan S. Weinbrechtc, Joe E. Tolerb and Grady L. Millerc

a Dep. Horticulture, D-136 Poole Ag. Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0375
b Dep. Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0375
c Dep. Env. Horticulture, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670

* Corresponding author (bmccrty{at}clemson.edu).

St. Augustinegrass [(Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntz.] is the preferred warm-season turfgrass for Florida's commercial and residential landscapes with an estimated 0.7 million hectare under growth and management. Limited published information is available on St. Augustinegrass response to plant growth retardants (PGRs). A 2-yr study was implemented to monitor St. Augustinegrass turf quality, lateral stolon growth, percent cover, mowing frequency, cumulative turfgrass clippings, and seedhead suppression following PGR application. Treatments were applied on 23 June 1995 and 22 June 1996 as a single application (SIA) at label use rate (LUR) or as twin split applications (TSA) at half LUR each: the sequential application was only used when mowing interval equaled the untreated. The PGRs and rates were flurprimidol [{alpha}-(1-methylethyl)-{alpha}-[4-(trifluoro-methoxy)phenyl]-5-pyrimidine-methanol] and paclobutrazol [(+/–)-(R*,R*)-ß-[(4-chloro-phenyl)methyl]-{alpha}-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-ethanol] at 1.12 kg ha–1 for SIA and 0.56 kg ha–1 for TSA, trinexapac-ethyl [4-(cyclopropyl-{alpha}-hydroxymethylene)-3,5-dioxocyclohexane carboxylic acid ethylester] and mefluidide [N-[2,4-dimethyl-5-[[trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]amino]phenyl]acetamide] at 0.28 kg ha–1 for SIA and 0.14 kg ha–1 for TSA, and imazapic [(±)-2-[4,5-dihydrol-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyridine-carboxylic acid] at 0.028 kg ha–1 for SIA and 0.014 kg ha–1 for TSA. Responses were observed for a 12-wk period following initial application, and turf quality was acceptable (>7) for all PGRs. Turf quality for imazapic was generally better than the untreated for Weeks 6 to 10. Greatest control of lateral stolon growth 10 wk after initial application was achieved with TSA of imazapic (68%) and mefluidide (61%). Percent cover 12 wk after initial application was lowest for SIA and TSA imazapic (66 and 53%, respectively). Greatest reduction in mowing frequency was provided by trinexapac-ethyl (50%), while flurprimidol and mefluidide reduced mowing frequency by 26 and 20%, respectively. The only PGR that reduced cumulative turfgrass clippings (CTC) was trinexapac-ethyl (63%). Greatest seedhead inhibition during peak production (about 35%) was provided by imazapic and mefluidide. The two most effective PGRs were trinexapac-ethyl (reduced mowing frequency and CTC) and imazapic (controlled lateral stolon growth and seedhead production), while mefluidide demonstrated some potential. Combinations of these products could be examined in future studies.

Abbreviations: CTC, cumulative turfgrass clippings • LUR, label use rate • PGR, plant growth retardant • SIA, single initial application • TQ, turfgrass quality • TSA, twin split applications




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. E. McCann and B. Huang
Effects of Trinexapac-Ethyl Foliar Application on Creeping Bentgrass Responses to Combined Drought and Heat Stress
Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 2121 - 2128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. E. McCullough, H. Liu, L. B. McCarty, and J. E. Toler
Trinexapac-Ethyl Application Regimens Influence Growth, Quality, and Performance of Bermuda Grass and Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens
Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 2138 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.