HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dumka, D. Articles by Maw, B. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dumka, D. Articles by Maw, B. W. Agricola Articles by Dumka, D. Articles by Maw, B. W. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Water Stress Cotton

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Delayed Initiation of Fruiting as a Mechanism of Improved Drought Avoidance in Cotton

University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793

^* Corresponding author (cbednarz{at}tifton.uga.edu).

Delayed fruiting in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) may result in enhanced root growth, which could improve the crop's ability to avoid episodic drought events. This study, conducted under a rainout shelter at the University of Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, examined the effects of delayed fruiting on cotton root growth and yield under irrigated and water deficit stress conditions. Delayed fruiting was achieved through fruiting branch removal at 35 and 41 d after planting (DAP) in 2000 and 41 and 48 DAP in 2001 such that the first fruiting branch occurred approximately at main stem node 9 in all plants within a plot. Water deficit stress was developed by withholding irrigation and rainfall beginning at first flower for 17 d in 2000 and 16 d in 2001. Root counts were made for six consecutive weeks beginning at first flower using a minirhizotron camera system. At harvest, 3 m of row in each plot was hand picked and boll counts and seed cotton yields were recorded. Delayed fruiting, irrespective of irrigation treatment, resulted in higher root counts. Delayed fruiting also delayed maturity and altered fruit distribution on the plant. Upper main stem nodes contributed more to boll number and seed cotton yield with delayed fruiting. In 2000, delayed fruiting with water deficit stress reduced yield whereas no such differences were detected in 2001. Thus, delayed fruiting resulted in increased root growth but did not enhance drought avoidance as determined by boll number or seed cotton yield.

Abbreviations: FI-FBR, full irrigation and fruiting branch removal • FI-NFBR, full irrigation and no fruiting branch removal • NI-FBR, no irrigation and fruiting branch removal • NI-NFBR, no irrigation and no fruiting branch removal

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. T. Campbell and P. J. Bauer Genetic Variation for Yield and Fiber Quality Response to Supplemental Irrigation within the Pee Dee Upland Cotton Germplasm Collection Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]