HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kershen, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kershen, D. L. Agricola Articles by Kershen, D. L. Related Collections Sustainable Agriculture Production Agriculture

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Legal Liability Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology

The University of Oklahoma Law Center, Andrew M. Coats Hall, 300 Timberdell Road, Norman, OK 73019-0701

^* Corresponding author (dkershen{at}ou.edu).

This article presents an overview of the legal liability issues in torts and patent law that arise from the use of transgenic crops produced by agricultural biotechnology. Torts—A tort is a civil legal action whereby the claimant alleges injury or wrong, arising independent of contract, to the person or property of the claimant. The article begins with legal liability claims for damage to property, damage to persons, and damage to economic interests (markets) that may arise with the use of transgenic crops. The tort theories discussed include the legal claims of trespass, strict liability, negligence, private nuisance, and public nuisance. With respect to each tort theory, the discussion points out unique legal issues that are likely to exist specifically because the litigation involves agricultural biotechnology. Patent Infringement—The article ends by focusing on four patent infringement cases that courts in Canada and the USA have decided regarding farmers who used patented seed from agricultural biotechnology without permission of the patent holder. As of May 2003, these are the only four patent infringement cases that have resulted in formal legal opinions by courts construing patent and antitrust laws in the context of farmers saving seeds protected by patents.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. de Beer Biotrespass Bulletin of Science Technology Society, August 1, 2007; 27(4): 287 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. F. Judge Intellectual Property Law as an Internal Limit on Intellectual Property Rights and Autonomous Source of Liability for Intellectual Property Owners Bulletin of Science Technology Society, August 1, 2007; 27(4): 301 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Khoury and S. Smyth Reasonable Foreseeability and Liability in Relation to Genetically Modified Organisms Bulletin of Science Technology Society, June 1, 2007; 27(3): 215 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. D. Hanson, C. A. Mallory-Smith, B. Shafii, D. C. Thill, and R. S. Zemetra Pollen-Mediated Gene Flow from Blue Aleurone Wheat to Other Wheat Cultivars Crop Sci., June 24, 2005; 45(4): 1610 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]