HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arbelbide, M. Articles by Bernardo, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Arbelbide, M. Articles by Bernardo, R. Agricola Articles by Arbelbide, M. Articles by Bernardo, R. Related Collections Crop Genetics Maize

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Random Mating before Selfing in Maize BC₁ Populations

Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108-6026

^* Corresponding author (berna022{at}umn.edu).

In maize (Zea mays L.) inbred development programs, F₂ and BC₁ populations between two inbreds are usually not random-mated before selfing. Previous results suggest random mating is not useful in F₂ populations. A one-locus model, however, suggests random mating increases the genetic variance by 50% in a BC₁ population without affecting the population means. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of random mating on the testcross means and variances of BC₁ populations. Random-mated and nonrandom-mated backcross populations were developed for two genetic backgrounds, Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and non-BSSS. Testcrosses of these four populations were evaluated at five locations in Minnesota and Wisconsin in 2002. For grain yield, grain moisture, plant height, ear height, root lodging, and stalk lodging, the differences between testcross means of random-mated and nonrandom-mated populations were not significant (P = 0.05), as expected. Testcross variances tended to increase with random mating for most traits in the two genetic backgrounds, but none of these differences was significant. Testcross means of the best 10% families did not differ significantly between random-mated and nonrandom-mated populations. Overall, the results indicated that random mating before selfing in BC₁ populations is not useful in applied breeding programs.

Abbreviations: BSSS, Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic • REML, restricted maximum likelihood • V_TC, testcross variance