|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Plant Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9
b Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
* Corresponding author (michaudr{at}agr.gc.ca).
Selection for reduced fiber concentration in forage crops is considered to be an effective approach to improve digestibility but often results in reduced dry matter (DM) yield. The objective of this study was to characterize timothy (Phleum pratense L.) genotypes divergently selected for fiber component concentrations and their ratios, and to identify selection criteria that could have a meaningful effect on timothy digestibility without adversely affecting DM yield. Divergent phenotypic selection was applied for neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose (HEM), and cellulose (CEL) as determined by the detergent fiber system of forage analysis and for ratios of ADL/HEM, ADL/CEL, ADL/(HEM+CEL), and HEM/CEL among 78 high yielding plants selected from among 2000 spaced plants from four populations. For each criterion, the two plants with the highest and the two plants with the lowest values within each population were selected. These plants were vegetatively propagated and composition of spring growth was evaluated in a 2-yr field experiment. The divergent NDF, ADF, ADL, CEL, ADL/HEM, ADL/CEL, and ADL/(HEM+CEL) groups of genotypes were significantly different for their respective trait. The ADL, ADL/HEM, ADL/CEL, and ADL/(HEM+CEL) groups were the most stable across years for in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), with the low groups having values of IVTD between 10 and 34 g kg1 DM above those of the corresponding high groups. The DM yield of the low-ADL/(HEM+CEL) and-ADL/CEL groups were also greater than that of their corresponding high groups by more than 13%. Therefore, ADL/(HEM+CEL) and ADL/CEL seem to be promising selection criteria to increase digestibility while maintaining or increasing DM yield.
Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber ADL, acid detergent lignin CEL, cellulose DM, dry matter HEM, hemicellulose IVNDFD, in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility IVTD, in vitro true digestibility NDF, neutral detergent fiber
Related articles in Crop Science:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Pelletier, G. F. Tremblay, G. Belanger, M. H. Chantigny, P. Seguin, R. Drapeau, and G. Allard Nutritive Value of Timothy Fertilized with Chloride or Chloride-Containing Liquid Swine Manure J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 713 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Y. Tecle, D. R. Viands, J. L. Hansen, and A. N. Pell Response from Selection for Pectin Concentration and Indirect Response in Digestibility of Alfalfa Crop Sci., March 27, 2006; 46(3): 1081 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stendal and M. D. Casler Maximizing Efficiency of Recurrent Phenotypic Selection for Neutral Detergent Fiber Concentration in Smooth Bromegrass Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 297 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stendal, M. D. Casler, and G. Jung Marker-Assisted Selection for Neutral Detergent Fiber in Smooth Bromegrass Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 303 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Claessens, R. Michaud, G. Belanger, and D. E. Mather Leaf and Stem Characteristics of Timothy Plants Divergently Selected for the Ratio of Lignin to Cellulose Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2425 - 2429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Claessens, R. Michaud, G. Belanger, and D. E. Mather Responses to Divergent Phenotypic Selection for Fiber Traits in Timothy Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1017 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||