HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Crop Science Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dhliwayo, T. Articles by Pixley, K. V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dhliwayo, T. Articles by Pixley, K. V. Agricola Articles by Dhliwayo, T. Articles by Pixley, K. V. Related Collections Post-Harvest Crop Protection Clover Maize

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Divergent Selection for Resistance to Maize Weevil in Six Maize Populations

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), P.O. Box MP163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe

^* Corresponding author (k.pixley{at}cgiar.org).

Maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky) is an important pest of maize (Zea mays L.) in the tropics, causing serious losses for many resource-poor farmers who store grain on-farm for use as food and seed. This study evaluated whether weevil resistance of six maize populations could be divergently changed by S₁ and S₂ selection, and assessed the importance of replicating grain samples when screening for resistance. Weevil resistance was evaluated for unreplicated S₁ and for replicated and unreplicated S₂ lines by infesting 50-g grain samples with 32 young adult weevils, and then incubating the samples in a controlled temperature and relative humidity (CTH) laboratory. Divergent synthetics were formed by recombining the most resistant 10% and the most susceptible 10% of at least 100 lines screened for weevil resistance for each maize population. Replicated S₂ selection was successful for both populations where it was applied, resulting in an average of 16% (P < 0.01), 49% (P < 0.05), and 20% (P < 0.01) difference between divergent synthetics for weevil progeny emerged, grain weight loss, and the Dobie index of susceptibility, respectively. S₁ unreplicated selection was successful for two of the six populations, while S₂ unreplicated selection was not successful. Reciprocal effects were significant (P < 0.01) for weevil resistance of F₁ varietal crosses among the divergently selected synthetics, indicating the influence of maternal effects. Nevertheless, the most resistant crosses were those among the most resistant synthetics, confirming that additive gene action for weevil resistance was important. Our results provide practical insights regarding methodologies and demonstrate that it is possible to improve weevil resistance of maize populations.

Abbreviations: CIMMYT, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center • CTH, controlled temperature and relative humidity • MDP, median development period (of the weevil)

Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2003 43: 1897-1898. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Dhliwayo, K. V. Pixley, and V. Kazembe Combining Ability for Resistance to Maize Weevil among 14 Southern African Maize Inbred Lines Crop Sci., February 23, 2005; 45(2): 662 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Garcia-Lara, D. J. Bergvinson, A. J. Burt, A. I. Ramputh, D. M. Diaz-Pontones, and J. T. Arnason The Role of Pericarp Cell Wall Components in Maize Weevil Resistance Crop Sci., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1546 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]