Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Simic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Published in Crop Sci. 43:1952-1959 (2003).
© 2003 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Comparing Methods for Integrating Exotic Germplasm into European Forage Maize Breeding Programs1

Domagoj Simicb, Thomas Presterla, Günter Seitzc and Hartwig H. Geiger*,a

a Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population Genetics, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
b Agricultural Institute Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia
c AgReliant Genetics, Westfield, IN 46074, USA

* Corresponding author (geigerhh{at}uni-hohenheim.de).

To broaden the genetic base of Central European germplasm of forage maize (Zea mays L.), it is necessary to integrate exotic materials into adapted breeding populations. The aim of the study was to compare several methods of integration by evaluating 18 initial crosses between adapted (recipient) and exotic (donor) elite dent inbred lines with regard to their testcross performance. Specific objectives were (i) to assess the effects of backcrossing the F1 to the recipient and intermating the F2 generation, (ii) to determine the benefit of selection for earliness, and (iii) to examine the influence of the recipient and donor genotype on the integration methods. Three foundation populations were developed from each of the initial crosses: F2, F2–Syn2 (= F2 twice intermated) and BC1. Fifty S1 lines were produced from the 4.4% earliest S0 plants of each foundation population. Bulks of these S1 lines along with the pertinent F1s and recipient parents were testcrossed with an adapted flint line. The testcrosses were evaluated in field trials at three locations in southern Germany in 1994 and 1995. Whole plant quality traits were investigated by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Differences between generation means were significant for all agronomic traits and for starch content and crude protein content. For dry matter yield, the effect of backcrossing varied among the initial crosses, while the influence of intermating was nonsignificant in most instances. Averaged across all generations, initial crosses which had inbred lines B73 or Mo17 as donors were superior to all other crosses for dry matter yield without being later in maturity. For maturity, the effects of backcrossing, intermating, and selection for earliness generally were all germplasm specific. This suggests that the choice of germplasm is more important than the integration method.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.