HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murray, L. W. Articles by Segovia-Lerma, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Murray, L. W. Articles by Segovia-Lerma, A. Agricola Articles by Murray, L. W. Articles by Segovia-Lerma, A. Related Collections Statistics Crop Genetics Biometrics

REVIEW & INTERPRETATION

Clarification and Reevaluation of Population-Based Diallel Analyses

Gardner and Eberhart Analyses II and III Revisited

^a University Statistics Center MSC 3CQ, New Mexico State Univ., P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001
^b Dept. of Agronomy and Horticulture MSC 3Q, New Mexico State Univ., P.O. Box 30003, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003

^* Corresponding author (estatu10{at}nmsuvm1.nmsu.edu).

Plant breeders and geneticists often use diallel mating designs to obtain genetic information about a trait of interest from a fixed or randomly chosen set of parental lines. Diallel analyses of broad-based populations have frequently been conducted by means of three analyses presented by Gardner and Eberhart in 1966. The original paper of Gardner and Eberhart used sequential model fitting to obtain estimates of effects and corresponding sums of squares. This approach, although having a long history, suffers from shortcomings which have led to confusion about what hypotheses the analyses actually test. The objectives of this paper were to delineate clearly all models implicitly required to perform Gardner and Eberhart Analyses II and III, and to present explicit formulas for effects in terms of the population means which are fundamental and unambiguous. While developing formulas of effects, we discovered a typographic error associated with variety effects in the original example of Analysis II. Our results also indicate that Analyses II and III effect formulas are rather nonintuitive both biologically and genetically, and incorporate multipliers that are functions of the number of parents. Another specific result shows that the varietal effects obtained in Gardner and Eberhart's Analysis III are "unconstrained" estimates, while those from the Analysis II are estimates constrained by the assumption of "no heterosis." These results have implications for the use and interpretation of such effects. A SAS computer program for analyzing diallels among broad-based populations according to Gardner and Eberhart's Analyses II and III is also reported.

Abbreviations: GE1, GE2, and GE3, Gardner and Eberhart Analyses I, II, and III, respectively • GCA, general combining ability • SCA, specific combining ability

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Sakiroglu and E. C. Brummer Little Heterosis between Alfalfa Populations Derived from the Midwestern and Southwestern United States Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2364 - 2371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Bhandari, C. A. Pierce, L. W. Murray, and I. M. Ray Combining Abilities and Heterosis for Forage Yield among High-Yielding Accessions of the Alfalfa Core Collection Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 665 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, M. S. Kang, and K. R. Lamkey DIALLEL-SAS05: A Comprehensive Program for Griffing's and Gardner-Eberhart Analyses Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1097 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. M. Ray, A. Segovia-Lerma, and L. W. Murray Diallel Analysis of Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Its Association with Forage Yield among Nine Historically Recognized Alfalfa Germplasms Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 1970 - 1975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]