Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Earl, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Earl, H. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Earl, H. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Published in Crop Sci. 43:1868-1873 (2003).
© 2003 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

NOTES

A PRECISE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD FOR SIMULATING DROUGHT STRESS IN POT EXPERIMENTS

Hugh J. Earl*

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7272

* Corresponding author (hjearl{at}uga.edu).

Many different approaches have been used for the simulation of drought stress in pot studies. An ideal technique should (i) maintain uniform soil water content within the rooting zone, (ii) allow the rate at which stress develops to be precisely controlled, regardless of differences in plant size or variations in environmental conditions, (iii) permit a range of physiologically distinct stress levels to be imposed and maintained indefinitely, and (iv) provide a means of accurately quantifying the stress level. In the present study, a computer automated null-balance lysimeter was evaluated against these criteria. Separate experiments were conducted with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growing in 2.5-L pots. Single plant water use was quantified gravimetrically by frequent, automated recording of pot weights, and transpired water was replaced by a computer controlled watering system such that relative soil water content (RSWC) was maintained within a narrow range. In this way, pots were held at four RSWC levels ranging from 20 to 75%. Despite the frequent additions of small amounts of water at the tops of the pots, soil water distribution within the pots was found to be remarkably uniform, suggesting that bulk RSWC was a suitable indicator of the soil water deficit experienced by the roots. Measurements of whole plant water use indicated that the four RSWC levels represented four statistically distinct levels of water stress. It is concluded that null balance lysimetry is a useful approach to simulating drought stress in greenhouse experiments, with specific advantages over other available techniques.

Abbreviations: AN, leaf net CO2 assimilation rate • gs, stomatal conductance to water vapor • NTR, normalized transpiration ratio • PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density • RSWC, relative soil water content




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E. V. Hufstetler, H. R. Boerma, T. E. Carter Jr., and H. J. Earl
Genotypic Variation for Three Physiological Traits Affecting Drought Tolerance in Soybean
Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 25 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Ennahli and H. J. Earl
Physiological Limitations to Photosynthetic Carbon Assimilation in Cotton under Water Stress
Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2374 - 2382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.