HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by May, O. L. Articles by Nichols, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by May, O. L. Articles by Nichols, R. L. Agricola Articles by May, O. L. Articles by Nichols, R. L. Related Collections Cotton

SPECIAL SYMPOSIUM—2001 CSSA MEETING (Charlotte)

Challenges in Testing Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton Cultivars

^a Dep. of Crop & Soil Science, Univ. of Georgia, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
^b Univ. of Arkansas, Northeast Res. and Ext. Ctr., Keiser, AR 72351
^c Cotton Incorporated, 6399 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513

^* Corresponding author (lmay{at}tifton.uga.edu).

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars transgenically enhanced to impart herbicide resistance to either bromoxynil [3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile; BXN (Bayer Advanced, Peoria, IL)] or glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)-glycine; Roundup Ready (Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO)], and/or Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki [Bt; Bollgard (Monsanto)] mediated resistance to certain lepidopteran insects were planted to 77% of the 2002 U.S. cotton hectarage, yet Official Cultivar Trial (OCT) protocols remain little changed since inception. The presence of transgenic, pest-managing, and nontransgenic cultivars in OCTs poses challenges to provide unbiased cultivar performance because OCTs impose herbicide and insect management regimes appropriate for nontransgenic cultivars. Our objectives were to assess the merits of OCTs to test transgenic and nontransgenic cultivars and to recommend alternatives. Because OCTs levy common pest management on all cultivars, value-added transgenic traits are not demonstrated, cultivar variation in their expression is not shown, and main effects and interaction of cultivar and pest management regime are confounded. Examples of pest management main effects that potentially affect cultivar ranks in OCTs include yield penalties imposed on herbicide-resistant cultivars from routinely used, soil-applied herbicides and yield advantages imparted to Bt cultivars from added insect control of OCT insecticide regimes. One recommendation to more comprehensively test cultivars is to augment OCTs with trials wherein the best performing transgenic and nontransgenic cultivars in OCTs are produced with their respective pest management programs. Such trials simultaneously evaluate cultivars and transgenic traits for yield, fiber quality, and economic returns. Still, bias imposed by nontransgenic pest management regimes in OCTs can only be quantified through trials levying transgenic and OCT-type pest management treatments on transgenic cultivars.

Abbreviations: Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki • OCTs, official cultivar trials

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Jost, D. Shurley, S. Culpepper, P. Roberts, R. Nichols, J. Reeves, and S. Anthony Economic Comparison of Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton Production Systems in Georgia Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 42 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]