HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smart, A. J. Articles by Vogel, K. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Smart, A. J. Articles by Vogel, K. P. Agricola Articles by Smart, A. J. Articles by Vogel, K. P. Related Collections Crop Genetics Other Forage Crops

FORAGE & GRAZING LANDS

Establishment and Seedling Growth of Big Bluestem and Switchgrass Populations Divergently Selected for Seedling Tiller Number

^a South Dakota State Univ., Dep. of Animal and Range Sci., Box 2170, Brookings, SD, 57007
^b Agronomy and Horticulture Dep., 279 Plant Sci., P.O. Box 830915, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
^c USDA-ARS, 344 Keim Hall, P.O. Box 830937, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

^* Corresponding author (alexander_smart{at}sdstate.edu)

Selection at the seedling stage in grass breeding would be extremely useful if seedling traits are correlated to desired agronomic traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate seedling morphological development, plant growth, and field establishment of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) populations that were developed by divergent selection for seedling tiller number while selecting for high shoot weight. Six populations were evaluated: (i) ‘Pawnee’ big bluestem base, (ii) ‘Pathfinder’ switchgrass base, (iii) big bluestem multiple tiller, (iv) big bluestem single tiller, (v) switchgrass multiple tiller, and (vi) switchgrass single tiller. Field plots were seeded in spring 1999 and 2000 in a Kennebec silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Cumulic Hapludolls). Plants were excavated and evaluated during the growing season for shoot weight, root weight, and morphological stage of shoot and root systems. There were no major population differences in shoot weight, root weight, and morphological root stage. Shoot stage was higher for multiple tiller populations than single tiller populations 6 wk after emergence. Stand counts for all populations exceeded 10 seedlings per linear m of row, which is considered an acceptable stand density, and there were no consistent differences among populations. Populations divergently selected for seedling tiller number did not differ in ability to become established under field conditions because root systems apparently were not altered by the selection for seedling tiller number and weight. These results suggest that selection for high shoot weight did not improve seedling vigor in the field.

Abbreviations: BMT, big bluestem high seedling weight, multiple tiller Cycle 2 • BST, big bluestem high seedling weight, single tiller Cycle 2 • MSCR, mean stage count root • MSCS, mean stage count shoot • SMT, switchgrass high seedling weight, multiple tiller Cycle 2 • SST, switchgrass high seedling weight, single tiller Cycle 2

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Casler and D. J. Undersander Selection for Establishment Capacity in Reed Canarygrass Crop Sci., April 25, 2006; 46(3): 1277 - 1285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Smart, L. E. Moser, and K. P. Vogel Morphological Characteristics of Big Bluestem and Switchgrass Plants Divergently Selected for Seedling Tiller Number Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 607 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]