Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Crop Science 43:1420-1426 (2003)
© 2003 Crop Science Society of America

FORAGE & GRAZING LANDS

Nitrogen Removal by Orchardgrass and Smooth Bromegrass and Residual Soil Nitrate

J. W. Singer*,a and K. J. Mooreb

a USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, Ames, IA 50011-4420
b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010

* Corresponding author (singer{at}nstl.gov)

Nitrogen removal by cool-season grasses may aid in capturing excess N from animal confinement operations or phytoremediation. Limited information exists on the N dynamics of these grasses near the asymptote of the N response curve. The objectives of this study were to evaluate N removal, residual soil NO3–N, and apparent N recovery in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) at annual N rates of 224, 448, and 672 kg ha-1. Species x harvest interactions were observed in both years, but no species x N rate interactions occurred. Orchardgrass removed 352 and 505 kg N ha-1 yr-1 at the 448 N rate compared with 207 and 371 in smooth bromegrass in 1999 and 2000, respectively. In a dry year, orchardgrass (r2 = 0.41) and smooth bromegrass (r2 = 0.31) exhibited linear N uptake. In a year with adequate rainfall, a quadratic relationship was observed for orchardgrass (R2 = 0.92), while smooth bromegrass had linear uptake (r2 = 0.66). Greater N removal was observed in orchardgrass partly because of superior fall growth, when 99 and 82 kg N ha-1 were removed in 1999 and 2000 at the 448 N rate compared with 23 and 15 kg N ha-1 in smooth bromegrass. These removal rates accounted for 28 and 16% of the seasonal total in 1999 and 2000 in orchardgrass and 11 and 4% in smooth bromegrass. Orchardgrass N removal exceeded smooth bromegrass in a three-cut system, and this difference was enhanced by utilizing the fall growth period to capture residual soil N.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. S. Mangiafico and K. Guillard
Nitrate Leaching from Kentucky Bluegrass Soil Columns Predicted with Anion Exchange Membranes
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 219 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
N. S. Eriksen-Hamel and J. K. Whalen
Fertilization and Mowing Effects on Unimproved Mixed-Species Hayfields in Quebec, Canada
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1955 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.