Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Golob, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Golob, C. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Golob, C. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Germplasm Enhancement
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Crop Science 43:1091-1099 (2003)
© 2003 Crop Science Society of America

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

Residue Management, Seed Production, Crop Development, and Turf Quality in Diverse Kentucky Bluegrass Germplasm

R. C. Johnson*, W. J. Johnston and C. T. Golob

Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6402

* Corresponding author (rcjohnson{at}wsu.edu)

Field burning has traditionally been used to stimulate Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) seed production, but air quality issues are making this practice untenable. Our objectives were to determine agronomic and crop developmental responses of 45 diverse Kentucky bluegrass entries under burned, mechanically removed, and residue-retained management systems, assess the scope for improving yield under nonthermal residue management, and relate seed yield and turf quality factors. Compared with burned treatments, yield was reduced 27% when residue was mechanically removed from plots, and 63% when residue was retained. Higher yield was promoted by a long heading-to-anthesis period, a relatively short anthesis-to-harvest period, and an early harvest date (maturity). Although both seeds per panicle and fertile panicles per square meter were positively correlated with yield, lower yield with nonthermal residue management was closely associated with panicles per square meter. For six of the 15 highest-yielding entries, no significant difference was found between yield in the burned and residue-removed treatments, showing the dependence of yield on genotype under different residue management systems. Turf quality was negatively correlated with yield (r = -0.48, P < 0.01, n = 44) and seeds per panicle (r = -0.55, P < 0.01, n = 44). However, panicles per square meter were not significantly correlated with turf quality, so indirect selection for yield through genotypes with high panicles per square meter in the absence of high seeds per panicle should have minimal impact on turf quality. Sufficient variation for seed production appears available to encourage development of germplasm for nonthermal management systems.

Abbreviations: HI, harvest index • NPGS, National Plant Germplasm System




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. L. Zapiola, T. G. Chastain, C. J. Garbacik, T. B. Silberstein, and W. C. Young III
Trinexapac-Ethyl and Open-Field Burning Maximize Seed Yield in Creeping Red Fescue
Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1427 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.