Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abadie, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abadie, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abadie, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biometrics
Right arrow Statistics
Crop Science 43:718-727 (2003)
© 2003 Crop Science Society of America

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

Comparing a Preliminary Racial Classification with a Numerical Classification of the Maize Landraces of Uruguay

Lucía Gutiérreza, Jorge Francoa, José Crossa*,b and Tabaré Abadiea

a Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de la Republica Oriental del Uruguay, Garzon 780, Montevideo, Uruguay
b International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico DF, Mexico

* Corresponding author (j.crossa{at}cgiar.org)

Plant genetic diversity is a major component of any agricultural ecosystem. Thus, it is essential to classify genetic resources properly to conserve, evaluate, and enhance germplasm efficiently. In maize (Zea mays L.), many classification systems have been used for delineating maize races. From the 1980s, with the use of computers, numerical taxonomy became increasingly important and multivariate methods began to be used for classifying genetic resources. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of classification of Uruguayan maize landraces: (i) a preliminary racial classification obtained through visual assessment and (ii) a numerical classification. The numerical classification was conducted by means of a two-stage classification strategy: first, initial groups were formed by the Ward method and, next, the Modified Location Model (MLM) refined those groups. This classification was compared with the preliminary racial classification by four criteria. The Ward-MLM strategy generated more homogeneous groups than those corresponding to the preliminary racial classification. The numerical classification maintained the structure of the more differentiated races, but divided the Cateto Sulino race into two more homogeneous groups, each with smaller variance and more differentiated than other groups. Numerical classification produced groups with clearly distinct characteristics, in terms of the numerical variables, and better, in terms of the four criteria used, than those formed on the basis of racial classification. These results will be the basis for an improved racial classification of maize landraces of Uruguay.

Abbreviations: MLM, Modified Location Model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
L. Gutierrez, J. D. Nason, and J.-L. Jannink
Diversity and Mega-Targets of Selection from the Characterization of a Barley Collection
Crop Sci., March 17, 2009; 49(2): 483 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.