HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leibbrandt, N. B. Articles by Snyman, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Leibbrandt, N. B. Articles by Snyman, S. J. Agricola Articles by Leibbrandt, N. B. Articles by Snyman, S. J. Related Collections Weed Management Agricultural Pesticides Other Crop Management Sugarcane

GENOMICS, MOLECULAR GENETICS & BIOTECHNOLOGY

Stability of Gene Expression and Agronomic Performance of a Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Sugarcane Line in South Africa

^a Coastal Farmers Co-operative, P.O. Box 1003, Umhlanga Rocks, KwaZulu Natal, 4320, South Africa
^b Biotechnology Dep., South African Sugar Association Exp. Stn., Private Bag X02, Mount Edgecombe, KwaZulu Natal, 4300, South Africa

^* Corresponding author (snyman{at}sugar.org.za)

Sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid) cultivar NCo310 was transformed with the pat gene, which confers resistance to the herbicide Buster (glufosinate ammonium; Bayer CropScience, Monheim am Rhein, Germany). The effect of the expression of this gene on the agronomic performance of a successful transgenic line, 22.2, was investigated. Field testing showed that the pat gene was stably expressed during three rounds of vegetative propagation. Morphological and agronomic characters such as stalk height, diameter, population, fiber, disease resistance, and yield, measured in the first ratoon, were not significantly different in the transgenic line and its untransformed counterpart. Of four weed treatments applied to transformed and untransformed plots, there were two scenarios in which significantly higher yields were observed: (i) untransformed cane treated using the conventional (non-Buster) herbicide protocol, widely used for weed control in the South African sugar industry, and (ii) transformed cane treated with a conventional preemergence cocktail, followed by two 5-L ha^-1 Buster applications. However, the most economical weed control treatment is dependent on the cost of the herbicide to which resistance has been engineered. Buster currently costs (in South African Rand) ZAR150 (US $14.01) L^-1. For Buster treatments to be cost effective for commercial growers, the price would have to be considerably lower. However, since hand-hoeing is deleterious to the cane, small-scale growers currently controlling weeds manually would find herbicide use an advantage. If they were to adopt transgenic sugarcane, Buster costs would need to be reduced only slightly for them to increase their returns.

Abbreviations: Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis • pat, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase • PPT, phosphinothricin • SASEX, South African Sugar Association Experiment Station • SCMV, Sugarcane mosaic virus • WCT, weed control treatment • ZAR, South African Rand

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Li, A. M. Brunner, R. Meilan, and S. H. Strauss Stability of transgenes in trees: expression of two reporter genes in poplar over three field seasons Tree Physiol, February 1, 2009; 29(2): 299 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Gilbert, M. Gallo-Meagher, J. C. Comstock, J. D. Miller, M. Jain, and A. Abouzid Agronomic Evaluation of Sugarcane Lines Transformed for Resistance to Sugarcane mosaic virus Strain E Crop Sci., August 26, 2005; 45(5): 2060 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]