Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Creech, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Creech, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Creech, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cotton
Crop Science 43:515-518 (2003)
© 2003 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Genetic Uniformity of the U.S. Upland Cotton Crop since the Introduction of Transgenic Cottons

D. T. Bowman*,a, O. L. Mayb and J. B. Creechc

a Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 8604, Raleigh, NC 27695-8604
b Dep. of Crop & Soil Science, Univ. of Georgia, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793
c Delta Res. & Ext. Ctr., P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776

* Corresponding author (daryl_bowman{at}ncsu.edu)

Field genetic uniformity is the probability that any two plants selected at random within a region carry alleles that are identical by descent. Genetic uniformity of field crops can occur through breeding with genetically related backgrounds and grower choice of a few related cultivars among other factors. Transgenic cotton cultivars currently dominate the U.S. cottonseed market, comprising approximately 72% of the Year 2000 cotton hectares. All transgenic cotton cultivars were derived through backcross breeding with popular nontransgenic cultivars. The objective of this study was to apply pedigree analysis to estimate field genetic uniformity since transgenic cultivars were introduced into the U.S. cottonseed market in 1996. Coefficients of parentage and proportion of hectares planted to transgenic cultivars were employed to estimate field genetic uniformity for the southeastern, south-central, southwestern, and western production regions. Compared with field genetic uniformity estimated in the Year 1995 preceding introduction of transgenic cultivars, field genetic uniformity did change (0.18 vs. 0.13). The number of cultivars planted on the largest hectarage has not changed, but the percentage of the crop planted to a few cultivars has declined. The proportion of the hectarage planted to the most popular cultivar also has declined. Both of these factors affected field genetic uniformity resulting in a 28% reduction in uniformity across the USA.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Smith
Pedigree Background Changes in U.S. Hybrid Maize between 1980 and 2004
Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 1914 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. I. Ragsdale and C. W. Smith
Germplasm Potential for Trait Improvement in Upland Cotton: Diallel Analysis of Within-Boll Seed Yield Components
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1013 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Zhang, Y. Lu, R. G. Cantrell, and E. Hughs
Molecular Marker Diversity and Field Performance in Commercial Cotton Cultivars Evaluated in the Southwestern USA
Crop Sci., June 24, 2005; 45(4): 1483 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2003 by the Crop Science Society of America.