Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bélanger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bélanger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bélanger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Crop Science 42:2044-2048 (2002)
© 2002 Crop Science Society of America

FORAGE & GRAZING LANDS

Phosphorous Uptake and Concentration of Timothy Genotypes under Varying N Applications

G. Bélanger*, A. Brégard and R. Michaud

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Bd., Sainte-Foy, QC, G1V 2J3 Canada

* Corresponding author (belangergf{at}agr.gc.ca)

Improving P uptake in timothy (Phleum pratense L.) would reduce excess soil phosphate while producing forage with greater P nutritional value. A strong relationship exists between N and P concentration in plants, and we hypothesized that genotypes characterized for contrasting N concentration or uptake may also exhibit contrasting P concentration and uptake. Two timothy populations derived from divergent selection for high and low forage N concentration were studied in Experiment 1. These two populations were also studied in Experiment 2, along with seven half-sib families identified in a field study as having contrasting dry matter (DM) yield and N concentration. In both experiments, a reference population, ‘Champ’, was included and plants were grown in a growth room with varying N rates. Independent of applied N, the genotypes differed for P concentration, P uptake, and P to N ratio (P/N), in forage and total biomass, as well as for leaf P concentration, leaf weight ratio (LWR), root weight ratio (RWR) and efficiency of P uptake for each unit of root biomass (PUPEroot). Averaged across N rates in Experiment 2, forage P concentration among genotypes ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 g P kg-1 DM, while forage P uptake ranged from 10.0 to 14.6 mg P per plant. Variations in P uptake and concentration were related to genotypic differences in DM yield, leaf P concentration, LWR, and RWR. Phosphorus concentration and uptake decreased under N stress. We conclude that variation exists among timothy genotypes for P concentration and uptake.

Abbreviations: DM, dry matter • LWR, leaf weight ratio • P/N, P to N ratio • PUPEroot, P uptake efficiency by root • RWR, root weight ratio


Related articles in Crop Science:

This issue in Crop science

Crop Science 2002 42: 1763-1765. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Casler, D. J. Undersander, and W. E. Jokela
Divergent Selection for Phosphorus Concentration in Reed Canarygrass
Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. K. Pant, M. B. Adjei, J. M. S. Scholberg, C. G. Chambliss, and J. E. Rechcigl
Forage Production and Phosphorus Phytoremediation in Manure-Impacted Soils
Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1780 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.