Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Crop Science 42:1656-1661 (2002)
© 2002 Crop Science Society of America

FORAGE & GRAZING LANDS

Fresh versus Field-Cured Grass Quality, Mineral, and Nitrate Concentration at Different Nitrogen Rates

Jeremy W. Singer*

USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (singer{at}nstl.gov)

Determining the extent of change in fresh versus field-cured grass hay quality, mineral, and NO3-N concentrations under rain-free conditions provides valuable information to hay producers. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the effect of fresh vs. field-cured forage on crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), total digestible nutrients (TDN), P, K, Ca, and NO-3-N concentrations of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.), and timothy (Phleum pratense L.), and to determine if interactions with N rate exist. At the low N rate in 1999 and 2000, orchardgrass CP in fresh and field-cured forage, NDF, and TDN concentrations were different. Orchardgrass P and K concentrations were lower in field-cured compared with fresh forage, but differences were inconsistent across N rates. In contrast, smooth bromegrass K (23 vs. 27 g kg-1) and Ca (4.3 vs. 6.2 g kg-1) concentrations were greater in field-cured compared with fresh forage in 1999 across N rates. Tissue NO-3-N concentration was greater in field-cured orchardgrass at all N rates and at the low N rate in smooth bromegrass in 1999. Interactions between N rate and fresh vs. field-cured smooth bromegrass were detected for all variables in 1999 and orchardgrass K concentration in 2000. These results demonstrate that changes in grass quality, mineral, and tissue NO-3-N concentrations occur under rain-free field curing conditions. Consequently, forage scientists conducting research on grass hay quality indices and mineral content should sample subsequent to field-curing to provide accurate results.

Abbreviations: CP, crude protein • DM, dry matter • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • TDN, total digestible nutrients


Related articles in Crop Science:

This issue in Crop science

Crop Science 2002 42: 1393-1395. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. W. Singer and K. J. Moore
Nitrogen Removal by Orchardgrass and Smooth Bromegrass and Residual Soil Nitrate
Crop Sci., July 1, 2003; 43(4): 1420 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.