Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bruening, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bruening, W. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bruening, W. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Soybean
Crop Science 42:1535-1540 (2002)
© 2002 Crop Science Society of America

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Synchronous Flowering and Fruit Set at Phloem-Isolated Nodes in Soybean

D. B. Egli* and W. P. Bruening

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091

* Corresponding author (degli{at}uky.edu)

Much of the variation in yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] results from variation in seeds per unit area, but the physiological regulation of seed number is not well understood. The relationship between the timing of flower development and pod and seed number was evaluated in three greenhouse experiments with a girdled-node system. Plants (‘Elgin 87’) were grown in 3.0-L pots filled with a soil-vermiculite mixture (2:1 v/v) and the main stem below Node 7 (one-node treatment) or below Node 5 (three-node treatment) was girdled when the first flower opened at Node 7. The leaves at Nodes 5 and 6 on the three-node treatment were removed and the main stem above Node 7 was removed on all plants. All nodes in the three-node treatment flowered at the same time and the total flower production was 68% greater than on the one-node treatment. The three-node treatment produced more pods (36–94%) and more seeds (36–78%) than the one-node treatment. Girdling-induced reductions in light saturated C exchange rate (CER) during flowering and pod set were consistently greater on the one-node than on the three-node treatment. However, the three-node treatment produced more pods per unit assimilate, suggesting that the increased CER did not account for the increase in pods and seeds. The number of pods and seeds at phloem-isolated nodes responded to synchronous flowering, suggesting that the timing of flower development may play a role in determining reproductive success in soybean.

Abbreviations: CER, carbon exchange rate • DAG, days after girdling


Related articles in Crop Science:

This issue in Crop science

Crop Science 2002 42: 1393-1395. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.