Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mebrahtu, T.
Right arrow Articles by Andebrhan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mebrahtu, T.
Right arrow Articles by Andebrhan, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mebrahtu, T.
Right arrow Articles by Andebrhan, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Crop Science 42:1465-1470 (2002)
© 2002 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Evaluation of Soybean Breeding Lines for Corn Earworm Antibiosis

Tadesse Mebrahtu*, Mark Kraemer and Teklu Andebrhan

Agricultural Research Station, Virginia State Univ., P.O. Box 9061, Petersburg, VA 23806

* Corresponding author (tmebraht{at}vsu.edu)

Corn earworm (CEW) (Helicoverpa zea Boddie) is the most serious insect pest of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and often has reduced yield in much of the Mid-Atlantic and southern coastal plain of the USA. The objectives of this study were to determine the magnitude of genotype x year interaction (GYI) of antibiosis to CEW and to identify genotypes with stable performance. Thirty-two soybean breeding lines, including two susceptible and one line resistant to CEW, were planted in single row plots arranged in a randomized complete block design in 1996 through 1998 at Petersburg, VA. Petri dish assays were used to evaluate terminal foliage of field-grown soybean for resistance to CEW. Data were analyzed by means of genotype x year analysis of variance (ANOVA) and cultivar superiority performance measure (CSPM). Even though there was considerable variation among the genotypes tested during the three growing seasons, genotypes that ranked consistently either lower or higher in mean CEW larval weight were found. Among the genotypes tested, V89-2623, VS94-42, and VS94-27 generally had the highest CEW larval weight, whereas VS94-11, VS94-12, and VS94-26 were consistently in the lowest CEW larval weight group. Results suggest that CEW resistance of these latter three lines is relatively less affected by environment. They could serve successfully as genetic sources for breeding resistance to CEW. The rank correlation between the combined over year mean ranks and cultivar superiority performance measure value ranks was highly significant (r = 0.985). This suggests that either method of analysis could be suitable in identifying genotypes with stable resistance to CEW. The CEW larval bioassay technique was reliable in separating resistant and susceptible genotypes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. Mebrahtu and M. Kraemer
Registration of VS94-11, VS94-12, and VS94-21 Soybean Germplasm Lines Resistant to Corn Earworm Foliar Damage
Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 701 - 702.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.