|
|
||||||||
a Advanta Semillas S.A.I.C., Ruta Nac. 33 Km 636, CC 294, (2600) Venado Tuerto, Argentina
b IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICET, Av. San Martín 4453, (1417) Buenos Aires, Argentina
* Corresponding author (avega{at}waycom.com.ar)
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) yields are strongly reduced when normal sowing dates are delayed. The objectives of this study were to investigate the physiological bases of the sowing date (S), genotype (G), and G x S interaction effects on sunflower yield, and to contribute to the formulation of ideotype-based selection strategies for improving yield at late plantings. Nine hybrids differentially adapted to northern and central Argentina were evaluated during two seasons in October (normal) and December (late) planting dates at Venado Tuerto, Argentina. Yield was defined as the product of total biomass and harvest index. Sowing date accounted for most of the yield variation. The G x S interaction, in turn, accounted for a portion of the total variability three times higher than the contribution of G. Both S and G x S interaction effects on yield mostly involved the variation of attributes and processes expressed postanthesis. Biomass differences between planting dates were the dominant determinant of the S effect on yield. The genotype-specific responses for harvest index were the dominant determinant of the G x S interaction, and were mostly associated with changes in the rate of harvest index increase. Variations in biomass and harvest index were strongly associated with the amount of intercepted radiation during grain filling which, in turn, was associated to duration of grain filling and green leaf area. Canopy stay green proved to be associated with adaptation to late planting dates. This indirect selection criterion appears to be a more reliable attribute for use in breeding for adaptation to late plantings than some other genotype characteristics linked to yield.
Abbreviations: A, anthesis DAA, days after anthesis E, emergence G, genotype HI, harvest index LAI, leaf area index PM, physiological maturity Qd, fractional radiation interception RUE, radiation use efficiency S, sowing date Y, year
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Berti, B. L. Johnson, R. W. Gesch, and F. Forcella Cuphea Nitrogen Uptake and Seed Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 628 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Ruiz and G. A. Maddonni Sunflower Seed Weight and Oil Concentration under Different Post-Flowering Source-Sink Ratios Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 671 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. de la Vega and S. C. Chapman Defining Sunflower Selection Strategies for a Highly Heterogeneous Target Population of Environments Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 136 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Aiken Applying Thermal Time Scales to Sunflower Development Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 746 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. de la Vega and A. J. Hall Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield: II. Components of Oil Yield Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1202 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||