Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de la Vega, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de la Vega, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by de la Vega, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Cytology
Crop Science 42:1191-1201 (2002)
© 2002 Crop Science Society of America

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield

I. Determinants of Oil-Corrected Grain Yield

Abelardo J. de la Vega*,a and Antonio J. Hallb

a Advanta Semillas S.A.I.C., Ruta Nac. 33 Km 636, CC 294, (2600) Venado Tuerto, Argentina
b IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICET, Av. San Martín 4453, (1417) Buenos Aires, Argentina

* Corresponding author (avega{at}waycom.com.ar)

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) yields are strongly reduced when normal sowing dates are delayed. The objectives of this study were to investigate the physiological bases of the sowing date (S), genotype (G), and G x S interaction effects on sunflower yield, and to contribute to the formulation of ideotype-based selection strategies for improving yield at late plantings. Nine hybrids differentially adapted to northern and central Argentina were evaluated during two seasons in October (normal) and December (late) planting dates at Venado Tuerto, Argentina. Yield was defined as the product of total biomass and harvest index. Sowing date accounted for most of the yield variation. The G x S interaction, in turn, accounted for a portion of the total variability three times higher than the contribution of G. Both S and G x S interaction effects on yield mostly involved the variation of attributes and processes expressed postanthesis. Biomass differences between planting dates were the dominant determinant of the S effect on yield. The genotype-specific responses for harvest index were the dominant determinant of the G x S interaction, and were mostly associated with changes in the rate of harvest index increase. Variations in biomass and harvest index were strongly associated with the amount of intercepted radiation during grain filling which, in turn, was associated to duration of grain filling and green leaf area. Canopy stay green proved to be associated with adaptation to late planting dates. This indirect selection criterion appears to be a more reliable attribute for use in breeding for adaptation to late plantings than some other genotype characteristics linked to yield.

Abbreviations: A, anthesis • DAA, days after anthesis • E, emergence • G, genotype • HI, harvest index • LAI, leaf area index • PM, physiological maturity • Qd, fractional radiation interception • RUE, radiation use efficiency • S, sowing date • Y, year




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. T. Berti, B. L. Johnson, R. W. Gesch, and F. Forcella
Cuphea Nitrogen Uptake and Seed Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 628 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. A. Ruiz and G. A. Maddonni
Sunflower Seed Weight and Oil Concentration under Different Post-Flowering Source-Sink Ratios
Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 671 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. de la Vega and S. C. Chapman
Defining Sunflower Selection Strategies for a Highly Heterogeneous Target Population of Environments
Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. M. Aiken
Applying Thermal Time Scales to Sunflower Development
Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 746 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. de la Vega and A. J. Hall
Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield: II. Components of Oil Yield
Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1202 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2002 by the Crop Science Society of America.