|
|
||||||||
a Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico D.F., Mexico
b Dep. of Agronomy and Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
c Dep. of Plant Agriculture, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G2W1
* Corresponding author (j.crossa{at}cgiar.org)
Linear-bilinear models, such as the Shifted Multiplicative Model (SHMM) and Sites Regression Model (SREG), have been used to develop clustering procedures for finding subsets of sites (or cultivars) without cultivar crossover interaction (non-COI). Biplots of these models are useful for visual evaluation of cultivar responses across environments. The main purposes of this study were to investigate (i) SREG2 and SHMM2 biplots with the first multiplicative components constrained to be non-COI SREG1 and SHMM1 solutions, (ii) how the biplots can be used for identifying subsets of sites and cultivars with different levels of COI and with non-COI, and (iii) how these biplots compare with results obtained when clustering only sites or cultivars without cultivar rank change. Transformed and untransformed data from two multienvironment cultivar trials were used for illustration. Biplots from SHMM2 and SREG2 models graphically display the interaction variation due to low level COI or non-COI (first multiplicative term) versus the interaction variation due to COI (second multiplicative term). The biplots obtained by means of the non-COI first term constrained solution of the SREG2 and SHMM2 models have the same interpretability properties as the standard biplots obtained by means of the unconstrained solution. With the unconstrained and constrained solutions, it is possible to identify subsets of sites and cultivars with low level COI and non-COI. Biplots based on unscaled or scaled data produced similar results. Groups of sites and cultivars with low level COI and non-COI were similar to those found when only sites (or cultivars) were clustered into non-COI groups using the SHMM and SREG clustering approach.
Abbreviations: SHMM, Shifted Multiplicative Model SREG, Site Regressions Model GEI, genotype x environment interaction COI, crossover interaction LS, least squares SVD, singular value decomposition
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Burgueno, J. Crossa, P. L. Cornelius, and R.-C. Yang Using Factor Analytic Models for Joining Environments and Genotypes without Crossover Genotype x Environment Interaction Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1291 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sabaghnia, H. Dehghani, and S. H. Sabaghpour Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Lentil Yield in Iran Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 760 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Roozeboom, W. T. Schapaugh, M. R. Tuinstra, R. L. Vanderlip, and G. A. Milliken Testing Wheat in Variable Environments: Genotype, Environment, Interaction Effects, and Grouping Test Locations Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 317 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rane, R. K. Pannu, V. S. Sohu, R. S. Saini, B. Mishra, J. Shoran, J. Crossa, M. Vargas, and A. K. Joshi Performance of Yield and Stability of Advanced Wheat Genotypes under Heat Stress Environments of the Indo-Gangetic Plains Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1561 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Egesi, P. Ilona, F. O. Ogbe, M. Akoroda, and A. Dixon Genetic Variation and Genotype x Environment Interaction for Yield and Other Agronomic Traits in Cassava in Nigeria Agron. J., June 26, 2007; 99(4): 1137 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Joshi, G. Ortiz-Ferrara, J. Crossa, G. Singh, G. Alvarado, M. R. Bhatta, E. Duveiller, R. C. Sharma, D. B. Pandit, A. B. Siddique, et al. Associations of Environments in South Asia Based on Spot Blotch Disease of Wheat Caused by Cochliobolus sativus Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1071 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Navabi, R.-C. Yang, J. Helm, and D. M. Spaner Can Spring Wheat-Growing Megaenvironments in the Northern Great Plains Be Dissected for Representative Locations or Niche-Adapted Genotypes? Crop Sci., March 27, 2006; 46(3): 1107 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O. PB. Samonte, L. T. Wilson, A. M. McClung, and J. C. Medley Targeting Cultivars onto Rice Growing Environments Using AMMI and SREG GGE Biplot Analyses Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2414 - 2424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yan and N. A. Tinker An Integrated Biplot Analysis System for Displaying, Interpreting, and Exploring Genotype x Environment Interaction Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1004 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Malvar, P. Revilla, A. Butron, B. Gouesnard, A. Boyat, P. Soengas, A. Alvarez, and A. Ordas Performance of Crosses among French and Spanish Maize Populations across Environments Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1052 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Butron, P. Velasco, A. Ordas, and R. A. Malvar Yield Evaluation of Maize Cultivars across Environments with Different Levels of Pink Stem Borer Infestation Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 741 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Narro, S. Pandey, J. Crossa, C. De Leon, and F. Salazar Using Line x Tester Interaction for the Formation of Yellow Maize Synthetics Tolerant to Acid Soils Crop Sci., September 1, 2003; 43(5): 1718 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. dos S. Dias and W. J. Krzanowski Model Selection and Cross Validation in Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Models Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 865 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||