Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass
Right arrow Remote Sensing
Crop Science 41:1884-1888 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

TURFGRASS SCIENCE

Quantifying Turfgrass Cover Using Digital Image Analysis

M. D. Richardson*,a, D. E. Karchera and L. C. Purcellb

a Dep. of Horticulture, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
b Crop, Soil and Environmental Science Dep., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

* Corresponding author (mricha{at}uark.edu)

Accurate cover estimates in turfgrass research plots are often difficult to obtain because of the time involved with traditional sampling and evaluation techniques. Subjective ratings are commonly used to estimate turfgrass cover, but the data can be quite variable and difficult to reproduce. New technologies and software related to digital image analysis (DIA) may provide an alternative method to measure turfgrass parameters more accurately and efficiently than current techniques. A series of studies was conducted to determine the applicability of DIA for turfgrass cover estimates. In the first study, plots containing a range (1–16) of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] plugs of specific diameter (15.0 cm) were established to represent values of turfgrass cover from 0.75 to 12%, by 0.75% increments. Digital images (1280 by 960 pixels) were taken with a digital camera and processed for percent green color to a software package. Estimates of green turfgrass cover by DIA were highly correlated (r2 > 0.99) to the calculated values of turfgrass cover. In a second study, DIA of turfgrass cover was compared by subjective analysis (SA) and line-intersect analysis (LIA) methods for estimating cover in eight plots of zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steudel). The mean variance of percent cover determined by DIA (0.65) was significantly lower than SA (99.12) or LIA (13.18). Digital image analysis proved to be an effective means of determining turfgrass cover, producing both accurate and reproducible data. In addition, the technique effectively removes the inherent error and evaluator bias commonly associated with subjective ratings.

Abbreviations: DIA, digital image analysis • LIA, line-intersect analysis • SA, subjective analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Dai, M. J. Schlossberg, and D. R. Huff
Salinity Tolerance of 33 Greens-Type Poa annua Experimental Lines
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 1187 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. E. Karcher, M. D. Richardson, K. Hignight, and D. Rush
Drought Tolerance of Tall Fescue Populations Selected for High Root/Shoot Ratios and Summer Survival
Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 771 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. Patton and Z. J. Reicher
Zoysiagrass Species and Genotypes Differ in Their Winter Injury and Freeze Tolerance
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1619 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. Patton, J. J. Volenec, and Z. J. Reicher
Stolon Growth and Dry Matter Partitioning Explain Differences in Zoysiagrass Establishment Rates
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1237 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Richardson, K. W. Hignight, R. H. Walker, C. A. Rodgers, D. Rush, J. H. McCalla, and D. E. Karcher
Meadow Fescue and Tetraploid Perennial Ryegrass--Two New Species for Overseeding Dormant Bermudagrass Turf
Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. R. Shaver, M. D. Richardson, J. H. McCalla, D. E. Karcher, and P. J. Berger
Dormant Seeding Bermudagrass Cultivars in a Transition-Zone Environment
Crop Sci., June 20, 2006; 46(4): 1787 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. V. Ottis and R. E. Talbert
Rice Yield Components as Affected by Cultivar and Seeding Rate
Agron. J., November 17, 2005; 97(6): 1622 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. E. Karcher and M. D. Richardson
Batch Analysis of Digital Images to Evaluate Turfgrass Characteristics
Crop Sci., June 24, 2005; 45(4): 1536 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. H. McCalla Jr., M. D. Richardson, D. E. Karcher, and J. W. Boyd
Tolerance of Seedling Bermudagrass to Postemergence Herbicides
Crop Sci., July 1, 2004; 44(4): 1330 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. E. Karcher and M. D. Richardson
Quantifying Turfgrass Color Using Digital Image Analysis
Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 943 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.