|
|
||||||||
Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agric. & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6
* Corresponding author (coberer{at}em.agr.ca)
A new locus (E7) controlling flowering and maturity time, and photoperiod response in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was identified by means of 20-h days of low (0.7) red:far-red (R:FR) light quality. The objective of this study was to characterize light quality and photoperiod responses of E7E7 and e7e7 soybean near-isogenic lines. E7E7 and e7e7 lines, in two genetic backgrounds, were grown in 20-h photoperiods with four R:FR light qualities (0.7, 1.2, 2.3, 2.7) and in 12-h photoperiods with 0.7 and 2.7 R:FR light quality. Under high R:FR, all isolines flowered early and similarly in both 12- and 20-h photoperiods. In 20-h photoperiods, as R:FR light quality approached that of natural day light (1.2), E7E7 lines flowered 6 to 7 d later than e7e7 lines, while under low R:FR (0.7), E7E7 lines flowered about 15 d later than e7e7 lines. Under low R:FR, all isolines flowered later under 20-h compared with 12-h photoperiods. Six Harosoy isolines (e7e7 and 5 E7E7 lines) were grown in 1998 and 1999 in the field under natural daylength and daylength extended to 20 h with incandescent lamps (ILD). The e7e7 line matured 6 d earlier than the E7E7 line under natural and ILD photoperiod. An ILD treatment was simulated in growth cabinets with 4+12+4 h of incandescent light and was compared with 12-, 20-, and 24-h photoperiods. All lines flowered early and similarly under 12-h photoperiod. The 4+12+4-h treatment delayed flowering less than the 20-h photoperiod. Flowering was not delayed further when the photoperiod was extended from 20 to 24 h. The E7E7 lines were sensitive to light quality. They did not perceive long days of high R:FR light quality, but under natural daylight and under low R:FR light quality, E7 delayed flowering.
Abbreviations: EOD FR, end of day far-red ILD, incandescent long daylength R:FR, red to far-red quantum ratio SED, standard error of a difference
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Williams, T. R. Sinclair, P. Mislevy, K. H. Quesenberry, A. S. Blount, and S. W. Coleman Photoperiod Sensitivity of Rhizoma Peanut Germplasm Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1366 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Benitez, H. Funatsuki, Y. Kaneko, Y. Matsuzawa, S. W. Bang, and R. Takahashi Soybean Maturity Gene Effects on Seed Coat Pigmentation and Cracking in Response to Low Temperatures Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 2038 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Abe, D. Xu, A. Miyano, K. Komatsu, A. Kanazawa, and Y. Shimamoto Photoperiod-Insensitive Japanese Soybean Landraces Differ at Two Maturity Loci Crop Sci., July 1, 2003; 43(4): 1300 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Cober and D. F. Curtis Both Promoters and Inhibitors Affected Flowering Time in Grafted Soybean Flowering-Time Isolines Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||