Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borrás, L.
Right arrow Articles by Otegui, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borrás, L.
Right arrow Articles by Otegui, M. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Borrás, L.
Right arrow Articles by Otegui, M. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Maize
Crop Science 41:1816-1822 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Maize Kernel Weight Response to Postflowering Source–Sink Ratio

Lucas Borrás* and María E. Otegui

Cátedra de Cerealicultura, Dep. de Producción Vegetal, Fac. de Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Capital Federal (C1417DSE), Argentina

* Corresponding author (borras{at}agro.uba.ar)

In maize (Zea mays L.), the negative effects of increased stand densities on final kernel weight (KW) are attributed to reductions in the effective grain-filling period, and not in kernel growth rate. This suggests that competition for assimilates among kernels only occurs at the last stages of grain filling. To test this hypothesis, two commercial hybrids of different KW were grown at two stand densities (3 and 9 plants m-2) during 1998 to 1999 and 1999 to 2000. Pollination treatments were performed in order to modify kernel number per plant (KNP) and to obtain a range of source–sink ratios. Pollination treatments altered KNP, and negative relationships were established between KW and KNP, with no differences between years. On the basis of regression analysis of the response of KW to changes in KNP, KW increased between 0.09 to 0.28 mg kernel-1 per unit decrease in KNP, depending on stand density and genotype. The theoretical potential KW was independent of preanthesis plant population effects, which affected ear growth significantly (P <0.01). Kernel weight was closely related to variations in kernel growth rate during the effective grain-filling period (r2 = 0.84; P <0.001), and not to modifications in the duration of this stage. Within each hybrid, the plant source–sink ratio established during the postflowering period explained KW response to modifications in KNP, independently of stand density. Hybrids differed in the capacity to transform biomass produced at the postflowering period into KW. This was in agreement with differences between hybrids in the capacity to sustain KW when the source–sink ratio was reduced. It is concluded that assimilate limitations to kernel growth occur during the whole grain-filling period.

Abbreviations: DAS, d after silking • KNP, kernel number per plant • KW, kernel weight • TT, thermal time




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
V. O. Sadras and D. B. Egli
Seed Size Variation in Grain Crops: Allometric Relationships between Rate and Duration of Seed Growth
Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 408 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. Tanaka and G. A. Maddonni
Pollen Source and Post-Flowering Source/Sink Ratio Effects on Maize Kernel Weight and Oil concentration
Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 666 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. A. Maddonni, A. G. Cirilo, and M. E. Otegui
Row Width and Maize Grain Yield
Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1532 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. E. D'Andrea, M. E. Otegui, A. G. Cirilo, and G. Eyherabide
Genotypic Variability in Morphological and Physiological Traits among Maize Inbred Lines--Nitrogen Responses
Crop Sci., April 25, 2006; 46(3): 1266 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Uribelarrea, F. E. Below, and S. P. Moose
Grain Composition and Productivity of Maize Hybrids Derived from the Illinois Protein Strains in Response to Variable Nitrogen Supply
Crop Sci., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1593 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
L. BORRAS, M. E. WESTGATE, and M. E. OTEGUI
Control of Kernel Weight and Kernel Water Relations by Post-flowering Source-sink Ratio in Maize
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2003; 91(7): 857 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
L. Borras, J. A. Cura, and M. E. Otegui
Maize Kernel Composition and Post-Flowering Source-Sink Ratio
Crop Sci., May 1, 2002; 42(3): 781 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.