HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cárcova, J. Articles by Otegui, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cárcova, J. Articles by Otegui, M. E. Agricola Articles by Cárcova, J. Articles by Otegui, M. E. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Ear Temperature and Pollination Timing Effects on Maize Kernel Set

Cátedra de Cereales, Dep. de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires (C1417DSE), Argentina

* Corresponding author (jcarcova{at}agro.uba.ar)

Maize (Zea mays L.) kernel set can be improved through synchronous pollination within and between ears. Reductions in kernel set could be expected because of asynchronous pollination between early- and late-appearing silks. We analyzed the effect of (i) selective ear heating around the time of silking, and (ii) different time gaps between early- and late-pollinated silks in an attempt to modify kernel set. Tip ear heating was expected to minimize the advantage of early silking ovaries. Lateral heating and pollination gaps were expected to exaggerate this advantage. Three pollination gaps (2, 4, and 6 d) were tested for two plant populations (3 and 9 plants m^-2). Ear temperature in the heated zone averaged 4.5°C above air temperature. Temperature in the nonheated side closely followed air temperature. Treatments promoted greater differences in maize kernel number (KN) per ear (73% variation) than in the number of silks exposed 5 d after silking (6% variation). Lateral ear heating reduced KN per ear in comparison with the nonheated control, but tip ear heating did not modify KN per ear. At 9 plants m^-2, synchronous pollination resulted in 15% increase in KN per plant. Pollination gaps of 2 and 4 d reduced KN per plant drastically (up to 51%), but the reduction was smaller for the 6-d gap. This study (i) gives evidence of the negative impact of delayed pollination timing among silks on kernel set, which was not related to reduced silk receptivity, and (ii) defines the time gap for maximum interference of early- on late-pollinated ovaries, a period shorter than 4 d.

Abbreviations: ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid • DAS, days after silking • E_n, ear n • H, hybrid • HD, high plant population density • KN, kernel number • LD, low plant population density • NP, natural pollination • PP, plant population • G_n, n-day gap between early- and late-pollinated silks

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Carcova and M. E. Otegui Ovary Growth and Maize Kernel Set Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1104 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Echarte, F. H. Andrade, C. R. C. Vega, and M. Tollenaar Kernel Number Determination in Argentinean Maize Hybrids Released between 1965 and 1993 Crop Sci., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1654 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Anderson, M. J. Lauer, J. B. Schoper, and R. M. Shibles Pollination Timing Effects on Kernel Set and Silk Receptivity in Four Maize Hybrids Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 464 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]