Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forapani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mandolino, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Forapani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mandolino, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Forapani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mandolino, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics
Right arrow Other Fiber Crops
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Crop Science 41:1682-1689 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Comparison of Hemp Varieties Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Markers

Silvia Forapani, Andrea Carboni, Claudia Paoletti, V. M. Cristiana Moliterni, Paolo Ranalli and Giuseppe Mandolino*

Istituto Sperimentale per le Colture Industriali, Via di Corticella 133, 40129 Bologna, Italy

* Corresponding author (g.mandolino{at}isci.it)

The objective was to study the genetic structure and degree of variability of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties. Six varieties of hemp were analyzed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, using 10 plants per variety. The varieties were a dioecious landrace, a dioecious selection from it, a cross-bred cultivar, a monoecious variety, a drug strain, and an inbred female line. The genetic complexity of each cultivar was investigated by determining the number of bands produced by the primers used, the number of fixed and polymorphic loci, the average allele frequency, and the heterozygosity. A good correlation was found between these parameters and the genetic origin and breeding strategy of each variety. The average polymorphism over all varieties and loci was 97.1%; the single cultivar polymorphism ranged from 31.1 to 85.5%. Heterozygosity ranged from 0.05 (inbred female line) to 0.26 (cross-bred Fibranova). The average heterozygosity calculated over all 102 loci and all plants studied was 0.29. The Fst (Wright's fixation index) value calculated for all loci was 0.48, and only 33.3% of the scored loci had higher values and can be considered informative for cultivar identification. A Fisher's test based on allele frequencies suggested complete differentiation among all varieties, with the exception of the Italian dioecious varieties Carmagnola and CS, for which no discriminating alleles were found. The correlations among the molecular data and the genetic structure of the different cultivars and the consequences in relation to variety discrimination in hemp are discussed.

Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism • bp, base pairs • AMOVA, analysis of molecular variance • RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA • RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism • {Delta}9–THC, {Delta}9–tetrahydrocannabinol




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. P. M. de Meijer, M. Bagatta, A. Carboni, P. Crucitti, V. M. C. Moliterni, P. Ranalli, and G. Mandolino
The Inheritance of Chemical Phenotype in Cannabis sativa L.
Genetics, January 1, 2003; 163(1): 335 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.