Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Crop Ecology
Crop Science 41:1522-1529 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Leaf Pigment and Canopy Photosynthetic Response to Early Flower Removal in Cotton

Randy Wells*

Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620

* Corresponding author (randy_wells{at}ncsu.edu)

Loss of reproductive organs from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) often results in compensatory growth that culminates in altered morphologic, physiologic, and photosynthetic patterns. This field study examined the change in leaf chlorophyll (Chl) and anthocyanin (Ant) contents and their relationship to canopy photosynthetic patterns in response to the removal of flowers for the first 2 wk of flowering. Flower removal caused an extended flowering period in all years except 1995 when temperatures were highest. The largest yield differences occurred in 1994, while there were no significant differences in any other year. Differences in canopy photosynthesis occurred on at least one date in each year that measurements were made. In 1997, significant differences were observed on four dates and plants from the removal treatment had 15% larger area under the seasonal photosynthetic curve. Chlorophyll concentrations were higher in leaves from the flower removal treatment after 100 d after planting. Anthocyanin levels were higher in controls during the same period, indicating significant negative relationships between Ant levels and either Chl a/b ratio or Chl concentration. Pigment differences late in plant ontogeny appeared to be associated with delayed senescence of plants from the removal treatment. While pigment levels late in development were associated with canopy photosynthesis, not all treatment differences could be related to Chl loss. In 2 yr, significant differences in canopy photosynthesis occurred prior to differences in Chl concentration, implicating other morphological and physiological adaptations in response to early fruit loss.

Abbreviations: A, absorbance • Ant, anthocyanin • Chl, chlorophyll • DAP, days after planting




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. Zhao, K. R. Reddy, V. G. Kakani, J. J. Read, and S. Koti
Selection of Optimum Reflectance Ratios for Estimating Leaf Nitrogen and Chlorophyll Concentrations of Field-Grown Cotton
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 89 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.