HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kennedy, C. W. Articles by Hutchinson, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kennedy, C. W. Articles by Hutchinson, R. L. Agricola Articles by Kennedy, C. W. Articles by Hutchinson, R. L. Related Collections Other Crop Management Cotton

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Cotton Growth and Development under Different Tillage Systems

^a 104 Sturgis Hall, Dep. of Agronomy, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
^b Northeast Research Station, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, St. Joseph, LA 71366

* Corresponding author (ckennedy{at}agctr.lsu.edu)

Adoption of reduced tillage systems is a means to lower production costs and improve soil productivity, but yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) can be variable. Our objective was to determine when and how different tillage systems affected growth quantities and yield. The effect of conventional tillage (CT), ridge tillage (RT), and no tillage (NT) on crop growth rate (CGR), leaf area index (LAI), net assimilation rate (NAR), fruiting form numbers and weights, plant population, and crop yield was determined on a Gigger silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic, Typic Fragiudalf). In 1991, the NT system produced a maximum prebloom CGR of 11 g m^-2 d^-1 compared with 7 and 7.5 g m^-2 d^-1 for the CT and RT systems, respectively. In 1992, a year with more adverse growing conditions, prebloom CGR values were lower for all systems but NT was greatest at 7 g m^-2 d^-1. Differences in prebloom CGR among tillage systems in 1994 were similar to the1992 results although values were similar to those of 1991. Prior to blooming, the RT system produced a consistently lower CGR than one or both of the other systems. Differences in LAI corresponded to CGR differences, but there were no differences among the three tillage systems in NAR. Greater early CGR led to faster ontogenic development and eventually to greater lint yields. Lint yields averaged 1057 kg ha^-1 for NT, 1007 kg ha^-1 for CT, and 890 kg ha^-1 for RT. The NT system, which in this study had the greatest prebloom CGR and lint yield, was the conservation tillage system with the greatest production potential in this soil type. Early-season differences in soil characteristics among tillage systems at 0 to 0.15 m was considered a factor.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • CGR, crop growth rate • LAI, leaf area index • NAR, net assimilation rate • NT, no tillage • RT, ridge tillage

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Marois, D. L. Wright, P. J. Wiatrak, and M. A. Vargas Effect of Row Width and Nitrogen on Cotton Morphology and Canopy Microclimate Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 870 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. B. Fritschi, B. A. Roberts, R. L. Travis, D. W. Rains, and R. B. Hutmacher Response of Irrigated Acala and Pima Cotton to Nitrogen Fertilization: Growth, Dry Matter Partitioning, and Yield Agron. J., January 1, 2003; 95(1): 133 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]