HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jost, P. H. Articles by Cothren, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jost, P. H. Articles by Cothren, J. T. Agricola Articles by Jost, P. H. Articles by Cothren, J. T. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Cotton

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra-Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton

^a Univ. of Georgia, Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, P.O. Box 8112 Georgia Southern Univ., Statesboro, GA 30460
^b Texas A&M Univ., Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, College Station, TX 77843-2474

* Corresponding author (pjost{at}arches.uga.edu)

Ultra-narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production is considered a potential strategy for reducing production costs by shortening the growing season. A 2-yr field study was conducted near College Station, TX, on varying soil types to document phenotypic alterations and crop maturity differences for cotton grown in 19-, 38-, 76-, and 101-cm row spacings. In the 19-cm rows, the plant densities were 12.2, 18.8, and 40.5 plants m^-2. Densities of 11.3 and 19.5 plants m^-2 were established in the 38-cm rows. In the 76- and 101-cm rows, plant densities of 11.7 and 7.4 plants m^-2, respectively, were evaluated. Plant height and node counts were reduced in the narrow (19 and 38 cm) row spacings in only 1 yr. The narrow row spacings at the higher plant densities consistently accumulated leaf area index more rapidly than the conventional (76 and 101 cm) row spacings. In 1998, when the study was conducted on a heavy clay soil, the higher plant densities in the 19- and 38-cm row spacings tended to partition more biomass to reproductive structures and yielded more than the conventional row spacings. In 1999, the test was conducted on a lighter silty clay loam soil and yields were unaffected by the row-spacing treatments. In 1998, the higher plant densities in the 19- and 38-cm row spacings had a greater percentage of harvestable bolls at the first fruiting positions on lower nodes, a boll distribution pattern that contributed to earlier crop maturity. Narrow row spacings and high plant densities did not consistently alter fiber quality. No conclusive differences for crop growth and development could be ascertained between the medium and high plant densities in the 19- and 38-cm row spacings. However, ultra-narrow row cotton may be more advantageous to producers when grown on heavier soils that typically do not promote excessive vegetative growth.

Abbreviations: UNRC, ultra-narrow row cotton • DAP, days after planting • LAI, leaf area index • PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. P. Viator, C. O. Gwathmey, J. T. Cothren, J. T. Reed, E. D. Vories, R. C. Nuti, K. L. Edmisten, and R. Wells Influence of Ultranarrow Row and Conventional Row Cotton on the Last Effective Boll Population Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1327 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. O. Gwathmey, L. E. Steckel, and J. A. Larson Solid and Skip-Row Spacings for Irrigated and Nonirrigated Upland Cotton Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 672 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Clawson, J. T. Cothren, D. C. Blouin, and J. L. Satterwhite Timing of Maturity in Ultra-Narrow and Conventional Row Cotton as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Agron. J., February 29, 2008; 100(2): 421 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Clawson, J. T. Cothren, and D. C. Blouin Nitrogen Fertilization and Yield of Cotton in Ultra-Narrow and Conventional Row Spacings Agron. J., January 3, 2006; 98(1): 72 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tewolde, K. R. Sistani, D. E. Rowe, A. Adeli, and T. Tsegaye ESTIMATING COTTON LEAF AREA INDEX NONDESTRUCTIVELY WITH A LIGHT SENSOR Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1158 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Boquet Cotton in Ultra-Narrow Row Spacing: Plant Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 279 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Marois, D. L. Wright, P. J. Wiatrak, and M. A. Vargas Effect of Row Width and Nitrogen on Cotton Morphology and Canopy Microclimate Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 870 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]