Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, W. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, W. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Cotton
Crop Science 41:1108-1113 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Environmental Effects on Cotton Fiber Carbohydrate Concentration and Quality

W. T. Pettigrew*

USDA-ARS, Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, P.O. Box 345, Stoneville, MS 38776

* Corresponding author (bpettigrew{at}ars.usda.gov)

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown in reduced light environments produces inferior fiber compared with that produced in abundant sunlight environments. This response to low light suggests that insufficient photosynthetic assimilates are the cause of the fiber quality reductions. The primary objective of this research was to determine how fiber carbohydrates respond to varying levels of sunlight during development. A field study was conducted from 1995 to 1997 in which cotton was exposed to two light regimes during reproductive growth: (i) incident sunlight and (ii) 70% of incident sunlight achieved with shade cloth. Samples of fiber, ovules, and leaves subtending the boll were collected at 0, 14, 21, and 35 d post anthesis (DPA) and analyzed for starch, glucose, fructose, and sucrose. Fiber quality was determined at the end of the season. With some exceptions, the shade treatment reduced carbohydrates levels in the leaf and ovule tissue. At 14 DPA, starch was reduced 29% in fiber grown under shade. Sucrose levels in shade fiber was reduced 31% at 21 DPA. The carbohydrate reductions at 14 and 21 DPA occurred during a period of fiber development when strength is determined. These carbohydrate reductions parallel the 3% fiber strength reductions seen with low light. The reduced sucrose levels at 21 DPA induced by the shade also occur during fiber secondary cell wall deposition and match the lower fiber micronaire produced under shade. These data present compelling evidence that adequate carbon assimilates are required to produce fiber quality approaching genetic maximums.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • DPA, days post anthesis • SLW, specific leaf weight




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. T. Pettigrew
The Effect of Higher Temperatures on Cotton Lint Yield Production and Fiber Quality
Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 278 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Hua, X. Wang, S. Yuan, M. Shao, X. Zhao, S. Zhu, and L. Jiang
Characterization of Pigmentation and Cellulose Synthesis in Colored Cotton Fibers
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1540 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. R. Reddy, S. Koti, G. H. Davidonis, and V. R. Reddy
Interactive Effects of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Nutrition on Cotton Growth, Development, Yield, and Fiber Quality
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1148 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.