|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 307 ERML, 1201 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 61801
* Corresponding author (j-juvik{at}uiuc.edu)
This investigation was designed to empirically compare the efficiency of marker-assisted selection (MAS) and phenotypic selection (PS) in enhancing economically important quantitative traits in sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Marker-assisted selection and PS were applied to three F2:3 base populations (C0) with either the sugary1 (su1), sugary enhancer1 (se1), or shrunken2 (sh2) endosperm mutations. One cycle of selection was applied for both single and multiple traits including seedling emergence, kernel sucrose concentration, kernel tenderness, and hedonic rating (taste panel preference). Twenty percent of the families in each of the base populations were selected and intermated to constitute MAS- and PS-based C1 composite populations. Selection efficiencies were evaluated on the basis of gains over one cycle and estimated evaluation costs. A total of 52 paired comparisons were made between MAS and PS composite populations. In 38% of the paired comparisons, MAS resulted in significantly higher gain than PS across the three C1 composite populations, while PS was significantly greater in only 4% of the cases. The average MAS and PS gain across all composite populations and selected traits, calculated as percent increase or decrease from the randomly selected controls, was 10.9% and 6.1%, respectively. Use of MAS is most appropriate when traits are difficult and costly to measure. However, for some traits, the higher gain from MAS can compensate for the higher costs of MAS. It was concluded that incorporating DNA markers to traditional breeding programs could expedite selection progress and be cost-effective.
Abbreviations: DAP, days after pollination C0, base population C1, composites created by intermating the selected F2:3 families using PS or MAS MAS, marker-assisted selection PRS, phenotypic recurrent selection PS, phenotypic selection QTL, quantitative trait locus/loci su1, se1, and sh2 are sugary1, sugary enhancer 1, and shrunken2 endosperm mutations in maize (Zea mays L.) RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. C. Schon, H. F. Utz, S. Groh, B. Truberg, S. Openshaw, and A. E. Melchinger Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Based on Resampling in a Vast Maize Testcross Experiment and Its Relevance to Quantitative Genetics for Complex Traits Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 485 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Gordon, M. Bartsch, I. Matthies, H. O. Gevers, P. E. Lipps, and R. C. Pratt Linkage of Molecular Markers to Cercospora zeae-maydis Resistance in Maize Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 628 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Yousef and J. A. Juvik Enhancement of Seedling Emergence in Sweet Corn by Marker-Assisted Backcrossing of Beneficial QTL Crop Sci., January 1, 2002; 42(1): 96 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||