Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahleen, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blechl, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dahleen, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blechl, A. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dahleen, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blechl, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Plant Disease
Crop Science 41:628-637 (2001)
© 2001 Crop Science Society of America

SYMPOSIUM ON GENETIC SOLUTIONS TO FUSARIUM HEAD BLIGHT IN WHEAT AND BARLEY

Transgenic Approaches to Combat Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat and Barley

Lynn S. Dahleen*a, Patricia A. Okubarab and Ann E. Blechlb

a USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Red River Valley Agric. Res. Center, Fargo, ND 58105
b USDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Albany, CA 94710-1105

* Corresponding author (dahleenl{at}fargo.ars.usda.gov)

Fusarium head blight (FHB) and contamination with deoxynivalenol (DON) produced by the primary pathogen Fusarium graminearum Schwabe [teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schwein.)] have caused devastating losses to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum Desf.Husr.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growers across the USA since the early 1990s. Evaluation of barley, wheat, and related germplasm yielded only a few accessions with partial resistance. This resistance appears, in most cases, to be under polygenic control, making the development of resistant cultivars with suitable agronomic and quality traits a challenge. The insertion of individual antifungal and antitoxin genes via genetic transformation has the potential to aid in development of resistant wheat and barley cultivars. Although wheat and barley transformation has been achieved in several laboratories, the development of a high throughput wheat and barley transformation systems has been slowed by genotype effects on plant regeneration, low transformation efficiencies, somaclonal variation, and problems with transgene inheritance and stability of expression. Among the antifungal genes targeted to combat FHB are coding sequences for proteins that degrade fungal cell walls, disorganize fungal membranes, bolster the host defense response systems, and interfere with fungal protein synthesis, pathogenesis, and/or accumulation of DON. Promoter sequences have been selected that confer high levels of expression to the antifungal constructs, particularly in the spike tissues which are susceptible to FHB. As more antifungal genes are inserted into wheat and barley, field and greenhouse evaluation will show whether transgenes achieve their potential in the fight against FHB.

Abbreviations: FHB, Fusarium head blight • DON, deoxynivalenol







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Crop Science Society of America.