HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kallenbach, R.L. Articles by Roberts, C.A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kallenbach, R.L. Articles by Roberts, C.A. Agricola Articles by Kallenbach, R.L. Articles by Roberts, C.A. Related Collections Crop Physiology & Metabolism Other Forage Crops

CROP QUALITY & UTILIZATION

Summer and Autumn Growth of Rhizomatous Birdsfoot Trefoil

^a Plant Science Unit, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
^b USDA-ARS, Plant Genetics Research Unit, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

Corresponding author (kallenbachr{at}missouri.edu)

A new population of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) with rhizomes (RBFT) has been developed for greater persistence. No study has compared RBFT with a standard, non-rhizomatous cultivar of birdsfoot trefoil (BFT). Objectives were to: (i) compare RBFT with BFT for differences in shoot and root mass and total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) concentration of taproots in both clipped and non-clipped situations and (ii) describe rhizome production of clipped and non-clipped RBFT. `Norcen' BFT and RBFT were grown in field plots near Columbia, MO, in 1994 and 1995. The study had four treatments: non-clipped RBFT, clipped RBFT, non-clipped BFT, and clipped BFT. Each treatment was replicated four times in a randomized complete block. Plots were sampled biweekly for shoot and root mass and taproot TNC from early-July until the first killing frost in October. In addition, length, mass, TNC, and number of rhizomes per plant were recorded for RBFT. From mid-September until the final sampling, the shoot mass for RBFT was about half that of BFT; however, RBFT's shoot mass was less affected by clipping than was BFT's. Taproot TNC was 20 to 40 g kg^-1 greater for RBFT than BFT throughout both growing seasons. Nearly all RBFT plants exhibited rhizomes by mid-October both years. Clipping RBFT plants did not affect rhizome growth. Rhizome TNC concentration increased steadily during autumn, with a final concentration of approximately 220 g kg^-1. The failure of clipping to decrease rhizome production, combined with higher levels of below-ground TNC, may give RBFT the ability to withstand frequent defoliation.

Abbreviations: BFT, non-rhizomatous birdsfoot trefoil • RBFT, rhizomatous birdsfoot • TNC, total nonstructural carbohydrate

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. G. Striker, P. Insausti, and A. A. Grimoldi Flooding Effects on Plants Recovering from Defoliation in Paspalum dilatatum and Lotus tenuis Ann. Bot., August 1, 2008; 102(2): 247 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wen, R. L. Kallenbach, J. E. Williams, C. A. Roberts, P. R. Beuselinck, R. L. McGraw, and H. R. Benedict Performance of steers grazing rhizomatous and nonrhizomatous birdsfoot trefoil in pure stands and in tall fescue mixtures J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1970 - 1976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]