Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Pursley, W.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Pursley, W.A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Pursley, W.A.
Crop Science 40:1656-1664 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP ECOLOGY, PRODUCTION & MANAGEMENT

Growth and Yield Responses of Winter Wheat to Mixtures of Ozone and Carbon Dioxide

A.S. Heaglea, J.E. Millerb and W.A. Pursleyb

a USDA-ARS Air Quality - Plant Growth and Development Research Unit, 3908 Inwood Road, Raleigh, NC 27603 and Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
b USDA-ARS Air Quality - Plant Growth and Development Research Unit, 3908 Inwood Road, Raleigh, NC 27603, and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ. Cooperative Investigations of the USDA-ARS Air Quality Research Unit and the North Carolina State University USA

asheagle{at}unity.ncsu.edu

Ozone (O3) in the troposphere can cause plant stress, whereas elevated CO2 generally enhances plant growth. Until recently, few studies have considered whether O3 can affect plant response to CO2 or vice versa. We examined these possibilities for soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants were grown in 14-L pots and exposed in open-top field chambers to all combinations of three CO2 and three O3 treatments. The CO2 treatments were ambient (approximately 380 µL L-1), or ambient with CO2 added for 24 h d-1 to achieve mean concentrations of approximately 540, or 700 µL L-1. The O3 treatments were charcoal-filtered air (CF), nonfiltered air (NF), or NF with O3 added for 12 h d-1 (NF+). Mean O3 concentrations in the CF, NF, and NF+ treatments were approximately 27, 45, and 90 nL L-1. In the first experiment, eight cultivars with widely different genetic backgrounds were tested. `Coker 9835' was relatively resistant to O3 and `Coker 9904' was relatively sensitive; these cultivars were tested in Exp. 2. Foliar injury caused by O3 was suppressed by elevated CO2 in both experiments. In Exp. 1, plant size and yield increased with CO2 enrichment in the NF and NF+ treatments, but not in the CF treatment. However, the O3 x CO2 interaction was rarely significant. In Exp. 2, growth and yield of C9904 was suppressed more by O3 than was that of C9835. Because of cultivar differences in sensitivity to O3, CO2 enrichment caused greater amelioration of O3 stress and greater enhancement for C9904 than for C9835. Significant cultivar x O3 x CO2 interactions occurred for all growth and yield measures. These results are similar to results with other crops, and further emphasize the need to consider possible interactions between O3 and CO2 when investigating effects of O3 or CO2 on plant systems.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • CF, open-top field chamber receiving charcoal filtered air • NF, open-top field chamber receiving nonfiltered air • NF+, open-top field chamber receiving nonfiltered air with O3 added for 12 h d-1 • A1.0, A1.4, and A1.9, carbon dioxide treatments at approximate seasonal proportions of the ambient carbon dioxide concentration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. K. Biswas, H. Xu, Y. G. Li, M. Z. Liu, Y. H. Chen, J. Z. Sun, and G. M. Jiang
Assessing the genetic relatedness of higher ozone sensitivity of modern wheat to its wild and cultivated progenitors/relatives
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2008; 59(4): 951 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. L. Booker, K. O. Burkey, W. A. Pursley, and A. S. Heagle
Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone Effects on Peanut: I. Gas-Exchange, Biomass, and Leaf Chemistry
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1475 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. O. Burkey, F. L. Booker, W. A. Pursley, and A. S. Heagle
Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone Effects on Peanut: II. Seed Yield and Quality
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1488 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. L. Booker, J. E. Miller, E. L. Fiscus, W. A. Pursley, and L. A. Stefanski
Comparative Responses of Container- versus Ground-Grown Soybean to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone
Crop Sci., March 28, 2005; 45(3): 883 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. S. Heagle, J. E. Miller, K. O. Burkey, G. Eason, and W. A. Pursley
Growth and Yield Responses of Snap Bean to Mixtures of Carbon Dioxide and Ozone
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 2008 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.