Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gent, M. P.N.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, Y.-Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gent, M. P.N.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, Y.-Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gent, M. P.N.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, Y.-Z.
Crop Science 40:1629-1636 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Mineral Nutrition of Tomato under Diurnal Temperature Variation of Root and Shoot

Martin P.N. Genta and Yong-Zhan Mab

a Dep. of Forestry and Horticulture, Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn., New Haven, CT 06504-1106 USA
b Yale Univ., New Haven, CT 06520 USA

martin.gent{at}po.state.ct.us

Should root and shoot temperature vary in synchrony to optimize nutrient uptake, particularly when there is a large difference in temperature from day to night (DIF) of air and soil? To answer this question, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seedlings were grown in greenhouses with the air heated to give either a +14°C DIF or a +5°C DIF in air temperature with a 16°C mean. The root medium was either unheated except by the air, or heated to 21°C constantly, only in the day, or only in the night. Experiments were repeated in early March and April in two years. Overall, growth was faster and there were higher concentrations of elements in leaves under +5°C compared with +14°C air DIF. Root-zone heating significantly increased growth and nutrition, compared with no heating. There was a trend in growth and nutrient concentration with timing of root heating: constant > day > night. These differences in growth and nutrition were similar under a +5°C or +14°C air DIF, and they were slight compared with no root-zone heating. For most nutrients, coordination of root and shoot activity related to uptake and metabolism did not require synchronous variation of air and soil temperature. Uptake and transport of nitrate was an exception. Heating roots in the day resulted in the highest nitrate concentration in leaves under a +14°C air DIF, whereas heating constantly was optimal under a +5°C DIF. Our results indicate nitrate metabolism did benefit from synchronous variation in air and root temperature.

Abbreviations: DIF, difference between day and night temperature







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.