Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.K.St.
Right arrow Articles by Futi, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.K.St.
Right arrow Articles by Futi, X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S.K.St.
Right arrow Articles by Futi, X.
Crop Science 40:1559-1564 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Genetic Gain in Early Stages of a Soybean Breeding Program

S.K.St. Martina and Xie Futib

a Dep. of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210-1086 USA
b Dep. of Agronomy, Shenyang Agric. Univ., Shenyang 110161, People's Republic of China

stmartin+{at}osu.edu

Multistage testing of genotypes is an essential feature in plant breeding programs. Little research is available to help breeders test efficiently. Our objective was to determine the genetic gain obtained in selected stages of a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] breeding program and to determine ways to increase the overall gain, if possible. The mean selection differential and genetic gain and their regression coefficient were determined for tests at the F3, F4, and F6 generations of the Ohio State University-Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center breeding program during 1985 to 1997. Genetic gain for yield averaged -1.4% in the F3 stage, 3.7% in the F4, and 9.1% in the F6 stage, where percentages are based on the mean of the common check genotypes. Overall changes in maturity were small at each stage. Improvements in lodging resistance occurred in the F4 and F6. Negative yield gains in the F3 were attributed to use of unreplicated plots and to the necessary selection pressure for early maturity. Examination of the selection differentials for individual lines indicated that selection could be intensified in the F4 and F6 generations with little risk of discarding potentially superior cultivars. The conclusion that near equality of the selection intensity across stages would be beneficial for this breeding program confirms the theoretical recommendations reported in earlier research.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. K. St. Martin and I. O. Geraldi
Comparison of Three Procedures for Early Generation Testing of Soybean
Crop Sci., May 1, 2002; 42(3): 705 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.