HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Giesler, L. J. Articles by Horst, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Giesler, L. J. Articles by Horst, G. L. Agricola Articles by Giesler, L. J. Articles by Horst, G. L.

TURFGRASS SCIENCE

Canopy Microenvironments and Applied Bacteria Population Dynamics in Shaded Tall Fescue

^a University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 448 Plant Sciences Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722 USA
^b Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 406 Plant Sciences Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722 USA
^c Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 377 Plant Sciences Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0724 USA

lgiesler1{at}unl.edu

Shading of the turfgrass canopy is assumed to support increased microbial activity and therefore more potential disease problems. The goal of this research was to determine how shading affects microenvironmental conditions, and how these conditions affect phylloplane colonization by applied bacterial strains. Shade cloth was suspended over tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) turf in field plots and environmental parameters were measured in shaded and full sun areas. Shading increased leaf wetness duration and relative humidity (RH), but decreased the average and range of canopy air and foliage temperatures. Three species of bacteria (Bacillus megaterium, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Enterobacter cloacae) were applied to all plots. Populations of B. megaterium were the lowest of the three species in both study years. Data showed that measurable differences in microclimate occur as a result of shading and that bacterial colonization was generally favored by shading. The lack of consistency between the two assay methods and among bacterial species regarding the effects of shading suggests that differences in response to microclimate conditions may exist among bacterial species or strains. Results indicate that shading should be considered when screening biological control agents for disease management.

Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming units • LAI, leaf area index • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • PB, phosphate buffer • RH, relative humidity • UV, ultraviolet

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Y. Yuen, C. C. Jochum, L. J. Giesler, M. D. Shulski, E. A. Walter-Shea, K. G. Hubbard, and G. L. Horst UV-B Biodosimetry in Turfgrass Canopies Crop Sci., May 1, 2002; 42(3): 859 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Williams, P. B. Burrus, and P. Vincelli Severity of Gray Leaf Spot in Perennial Ryegrass as Influenced by Mowing Height and Nitrogen Level Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1207 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]