Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by del Blanco, I.A.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by del Blanco, I.A.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by del Blanco, I.A.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.P.
Crop Science 40:1257-1263 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Physiological Performance of Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat-Derived Populations

I.A. del Blancoa, S. Rajaramc, W.E. Kronstadb and M.P. Reynoldsc

a Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105 USA
b Crop and Soil Sci. Dep., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
c CIMMYT, Apdo., Postal 6-641., 06600 Mexico DF, Mexico

isabel_delblanco{at}ndsu.nodak.edu

Wild ancestors of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) have been reported to have higher maximum photosynthetic rates than modern wheat cultivars. Synthetic hexaploids, obtained by crossing tetraploid wheat and Aegilops tauschii Coss., have proven useful as a source of resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. This study was conducted to determine whether synthetic hexaploids also could contribute genetic diversity to enhance leaf photosynthetic rate and other physiological traits. Three different populations of BC2F2:6 synthetic-derived lines were evaluated at the Agricultural Research Center for the Northwest (INIFAP) Experimental Station, near Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico. Differences in maximum photosynthetic rate were detected among genotypes. Several synthetic-derived lines showed higher photosynthetic rates than their recurrent parent. Staygreen, determined as days between senescence and physiological maturity, of most synthetic-derived lines did not differ from the recurrent parents. Maximum photosynthetic rate was negatively associated with leaf area and positively associated with stomatal and mesophyll conductances, and leaf temperature depression. Mesophyll conductance accounted for 85% of the variation in maximum photosynthetic rate. These results suggest that synthetic-derived wheat can be also a source of genetic diversity for important physiological traits such as enhanced photosynthetic rate.

Abbreviations: Am, maximum photosynthetic rate • CER, carbon exchange rate • Ci, intracellular CO2 concentration • {Delta}T, leaf temperature depression • gs, stomatal conductance • mc, mesophyll conductance • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • Stg, staygreen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Koc, C. Barutcular, and I. Genc
Photosynthesis and Productivity of Old and Modern Durum Wheats in a Mediterranean Environment
Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2089 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. D. Smith, K. K. Kidwell, M. A. Evans, R. J. Cook, and R. W. Smiley
Evaluation of Spring Cereal Grains and Wild Triticum Germplasm for Resistance to Rhizoctonia solani AG-8
Crop Sci., March 1, 2003; 43(2): 701 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.