Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peel, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmusson, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peel, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmusson, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peel, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmusson, D. C.
Crop Science 40:1241-1246 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Improvement Strategy for Mature Plant Breeding Programs

Michael D. Peela and Donald C. Rasmussonb

a Dep. of Plant Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105 USA
b Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA

mpeel{at}ndsuext.nodak.edu

In mature plant breeding programs an elite core germplasm forms the backbone of the breeding effort, confronting the breeder with the challenge of maintaining germplasm diversity as genetic distance between the elite core germplasm and donor germplasm widens. This research assessed the effects on grain yield of transferring genes from two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars to a six-row gene pool. We conducted three cycles of recurrent-type breeding, beginning with crosses involving five two-row donor parents. The crossing scheme led to progenies with theoretical proportions of two-row germplasm of 25 to 50% in Cycle 1, 12.5 to 25% in Cycle 2 and 6.25 to 12.5% in Cycle 3. In Cycle 1, yield of the six-row progeny across the five populations ranged from 86 to 97% of the respective six-row parent. Kernel weight of the six-row progeny was also low in Cycle 1. In Cycle 2, grain yield improved to 99% of the check mean and kernel weight improved to 102% of the check mean. In Cycle 3, sets of lines representing three populations yielded from 112 to 119% of the check mean in 1997 and 1998 and individual lines surpassed `Stander', the highest yielding check in both 1997 to 1998. The highest yielding lines in each cycle were derived from populations having the highest theoretical percentage of adapted recurrent parent germplasm, that is, when six-row gene combinations were predominately left intact. Results from the three breeding cycles support the proposition that a strategy that maintains favorable gene combinations while introgressing relatively small amounts of donor germplasm can lead to incremental yield gains.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
F. Condon, C. Gustus, D. C. Rasmusson, and K. P. Smith
Effect of Advanced Cycle Breeding on Genetic Diversity in Barley Breeding Germplasm
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 1027 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Yu and R. Bernardo
Changes in Genetic Variance during Advanced Cycle Breeding in Maize
Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 405 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.