HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ball, R. A. Articles by Vories, E. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ball, R. A. Articles by Vories, E. D. Agricola Articles by Ball, R. A. Articles by Vories, E. D.

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Optimizing Soybean Plant Population for a Short-Season Production System in the Southern USA

^a Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, 276 Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA
^b Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Univ. of Arkansas, P.O. Box 48, Keiser, AR 72351 USA

lpurcell{at}comp.uark.edu

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production systems that utilize short-season cultivars for double cropping and late sowing often have insufficient time to establish a complete canopy prior to reproductive development. Our objectives were to evaluate plant population as a tool to manage crop growth, maximum biomass (BM), the time required for canopy closure, and yield. Field tests were sown on 8 July 1997 and 26 June 1998 at Keiser, AR (35° 67' N, 90° 83' W) in 0.19-, 0.57-, and 0.95-m rows with maturity group IV soybean cultivars Asgrow 4922 (A4922) and Manokin. Yield from irrigated and nonirrigated treatments increased as population density increased from 7 to 134 plants m^-2, except when lodging occurred. Populations recommended for early-season sowing (25–35 plants m^-2) resulted in many plots not achieving 90% light interception (LI), especially in 1998 when weather was hotter and drier than in 1997. The time required after emergence to begin linear crop growth (t_b) was dependent on LI, and as density increased, t_b decreased. The values of t_b varied from 16 to 27 d in 1997 and 22 to 37 d in 1998, with up to 12 d difference in achieving >90% LI. In this short-season production system, yield, crop growth rate between R1 and R5, BM, and t_b were dependent upon the early establishment of a high LI. Losses attributable to excessive delays in canopy establishment and slow crop growth could be minimized by using high populations in narrow rows. Our research indicates that higher populations than are traditionally recommended provide a way to optimize grain yields in time-constrained systems.

Abbreviations: BM, biomass • CGR, crop growth rate • DAE, days after emergence • HI, harvest index • LI, light interception • MG, maturity group • t_b , lost time

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Lee, D. B. Egli, and D. M. TeKrony Soybean Response to Plant Population at Early and Late Planting Dates in the Mid-South Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 971 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kyei-Boahen and L. Zhang Early-Maturing Soybean in a Wheat-Soybean Double-Crop System: Yield and Net Returns Agron. J., February 7, 2006; 98(2): 295 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Poag, M. Popp, J. Rupe, B. Dixon, C. Rothrock, and C. Boger Economic Evaluation of Soybean Fungicide Seed Treatments Agron. J., November 17, 2005; 97(6): 1647 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Edwards and L. C. Purcell Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population Among Diverse Maturity Groups: I. Agronomic Characteristics Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1770 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Edwards, L. C. Purcell, and D. E. Karcher Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population among Diverse Maturity Groups: II. Light Interception and Utilization Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1778 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Heitholt, J. B. Farr, and R. Eason Planting Configuration x Cultivar Effects on Soybean Production in Low-Yield Environments Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1800 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Popp, J. Edwards, L. Purcell, and P. Manning Early-Maturity Soybean in a Late-Maturity Environment: Economic Considerations Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1711 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Board, M. S. Kang, and M. L. Bodrero Yield Components as Indirect Selection Criteria for Late-Planted Soybean Cultivars Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 420 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. P. Jones, D. L. Holshouser, M. M. Alley, J. K.F. Roygard, and C. M. Anderson-Cook Double-Crop Soybean Leaf Area and Yield Responses to Mid-Atlantic Soils and Cropping Systems Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 436 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Norsworthy and J. R. Frederick Reduced Seeding Rate for Glyphosate-Resistant, Drilled Soybean on the Southeastern Coastal Plain Agron. J., November 1, 2002; 94(6): 1282 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Board A Regression Model to Predict Soybean Cultivar Yield Performance at Late Planting Dates Agron. J., May 1, 2002; 94(3): 483 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Purcell, R. A. Ball, J. D. Reaper III, and E. D. Vories Radiation Use Efficiency and Biomass Production in Soybean at Different Plant Population Densities Crop Sci., January 1, 2002; 42(1): 172 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Ball, R. W. McNew, E. D. Vories, T. C. Keisling, and L. C. Purcell Path Analyses of Population Density Effects on Short-Season Soybean Yield Agron. J., January 1, 2001; 93(1): 187 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. A. Ball, L. C. Purcell, and E. D. Vories Short-Season Soybean Yield Compensation in Response to Population and Water Regime Crop Sci., July 1, 2000; 40(4): 1070 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text]