|
|
||||||||
a Laboratory Center, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, P.R. People's Republic of China
b Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., 1150 Lilly Hall of Life Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47905-1150 USA
bernardo{at}purdue.edu
An Essentially Derived Variety is a cultivar or inbred that largely retains the characteristics of an ancestral cultivar or inbred. The parental contribution to F2-derived inbreds (pF2) and BC1-derived inbreds (pBC1) can be estimated with molecular markers. A recombinant inbred (RI) with pF2 or pBC1 greater than a specified threshold is then considered essentially derived. Our objectives were (i) to derive the variance of pF2 and pBC1, and (ii) to determine the probability of obtaining an essentially derived RI for different numbers of marker loci in different species. The variances of pF2 and pBC1 are a function of the number of chromosomes, length of each chromosome, and number of marker loci on each chromosome. The standard errors (SE) of pF2 and pBC1 were smallest when the two marker loci closest to the ends of each chromosome were included. The minimum values of SE(pF2) and SE(pBC1) are useful for setting minimum values of thresholds for declaring essential derivation. Suppose selfing from the BC1 is permissible and the maximum error rate for falsely declaring an RI is essentially derived is set at 2.5%. The minimum value of the threshold for these conditions is 0.881 in maize (Zea mays L.). For a threshold of 0.90, the probabilities of an essentially derived RI from the BC1 generation were >6% in rye (Secale cereale L.), >3% in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), <3% in tomato (Lycopersicon spp.), rice (Oryza spp.), and maize, and <1% wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). These results suggest that the thresholds used to declare essential derivation should differ among species.
Abbreviations: cM, centimorgans RI, recombinant inbred
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. R. Hallauer History, Contribution, and Future of Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding: Lessons From Maize Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-4 - S-19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Frisch and A. E. Melchinger Variance of the Parental Genome Contribution to Inbred Lines Derived From Biparental Crosses Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 477 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Heckenberger, M. Bohn, and A. E. Melchinger Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines: I. Simple Sequence Repeat Data from Maize Inbreds Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1120 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. C. Smith, D. N. Duvick, O. S. Smith, M. Cooper, and L. Feng Changes in Pedigree Backgrounds of Pioneer Brand Maize Hybrids Widely Grown from 1930 to 1999 Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 1935 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||