Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panneton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Khelifi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Panneton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Khelifi, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Panneton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Khelifi, M.
Crop Science 40:444-448 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP ECOLOGY, PRODUCTION & MANAGEMENT

Spray Chamber Evaluation of Air-Assisted Spraying on Broccoli

Bernard Pannetona, Hubert Philionb, Roger Thériaultb and Mohamed Khelifib

a Horticultural Research & Development Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 430, Gouin Blvd, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, Canada, J3B 3E6
b Dep. of Soil Science and Agri-Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Laval Univ., Quebec, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4

pannetonb{at}em.agr.ca

Conventional over-the-row sprayers achieve very little deposit on leaves near the ground and on the underside surfaces of leaves throughout the canopy. Air assistance has the potential to improve deposition of droplets on these leaf surfaces. To gain some insight on the effect of air assistance, the effects of airspeed, airflow rate, and air jet orientation were isolated. The study was carried out in a spray chamber with a standard spray boom over micro-plots of greenhouse grown broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) plants. Air was delivered slightly behind the nozzles from a variable width slot producing a uniform two-dimensional air jet. The orientation of the air jet with respect to the vertical could be adjusted from -10 to 40°. The ranges of the independent variables were airspeed, 0 to 36 m s-1; airflow rate, 0 to 1.3 m3 s-1 m-1, and air jet angle, -10.2 to 40.2°. Two sets of flat fan nozzles (Volume Median Diameter = 230 and 400 µm, both delivering 250 L ha-1 at 6 km h-1) were used to carry out two full sets of experiments. Results showed that airspeed had the larger impact on leaf coverage. Higher airspeeds (>25 m s-1) and airflow coupled with finer sprays increased the coverage of the underside of the leaves at all levels within the canopy and of the top side of the leaves in the lower third of the canopy. However, lower airspeeds (<20 m s-1) are desirable for a better coverage of the upper side of the leaves in the higher two-thirds of the canopy. In all cases, angling the air jet forward at 20 to 25° is recommended.

Abbreviations: VMD, volume median diameter • CCD, central composite design • Y, number of bright pixels • Q, airflow rate • V, airspeed • {theta}, air jet angle







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.