|
|
||||||||
a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Bd., Sainte-Foy, QC, G1V 2J3, Canada. Contribution no. 639 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
belangergf{at}em.agr.ca
Improving timothy (Phleum pratense L.) N use efficiency (NUE) through genetic selection aims at producing greater or similar forage dry matter (DM) yields with less N fertilizer while maintaining N concentration close to the optimal level required for ruminant nutrition. Two populations of timothy, arising from divergent selection for high (N+) and low (N-) forage N concentration, and a reference population, `Champ', were studied under controlled conditions with N rates of 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg N plant-1 wk-1. The populations N- and Champ produced more forage DM yield than N+. This difference in forage production was the result of changes in biomass partitioning between shoots and roots because, at the whole plant level, no differences in total biomass (shoots + roots) were found. On the basis of total biomass, there were no population differences in NUE and N accumulation efficiency (NAE). For a given level of forage DM yield, N+ had a greater N accumulation than N- and Champ and, therefore, a greater N concentration. The greater forage N concentration of N+ was not due to a greater leaf N concentration but to a greater proportion of leaves. The population N+ also had a greater proportion of roots than N-. The forage insoluble N concentration of N+ was greater than that of N-, while NO3N concentrations of the populations were similar. The population N+ had a greater tiller density and specific leaf area (SLA) than N-. Differences in forage DM yield and N concentration between two populations selected for low and high N concentrations were mainly due to the modification of C and N partitioning between shoots and roots, and between leaves and stems. Our results highlight the role of biomass partitioning in improving grass NUE or N concentration.
Abbreviations: DM, dry matter LERleaf, leaf elongation rate of an entire leaf LERlin, leaf elongation rate during the linear portion of leaf growth LNAR, leaf N accumulation ratio LWR, leaf weight ratio N-, population selected for low forage N concentration N+, population selected for high forage N concentration NAE, N accumulation efficiency NCE, N conversion efficiency NUE, N use efficiency SLA, specific leaf area
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bonesmo, G. Belanger, E. Charmley, R. Drapeau, D. B. McKenzie, R. Michaud, and G. F. Tremblay Timothy Yield and Nutritive Value by the CATIMO Model: III. Validation for Eastern Canada Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Marino, A. Mazzanti, S. G. Assuero, F. Gastal, H. E. Echeverria, and F. Andrade Nitrogen Dilution Curves and Nitrogen Use Efficiency During Winter-Spring Growth of Annual Ryegrass Agron. J., May 1, 2004; 96(3): 601 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Belanger, A. Bregard, and R. Michaud Phosphorous Uptake and Concentration of Timothy Genotypes under Varying N Applications Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 2044 - 2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bonesmo and G. Belanger Timothy Yield and Nutritive Value by the CATIMO Model: I. Growth and Nitrogen Agron. J., March 1, 2002; 94(2): 337 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bregard, G. Belanger, R. Michaud, and G. F. Tremblay Biomass Partitioning, Forage Nutritive Value, and Yield of Contrasting Genotypes of Timothy Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1212 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||