Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lamkey, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lamkey, K. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lamkey, K. R.
Crop Science 40:338-346 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Effective Population Size and Genetic Variability in the BS11 Maize Population

Peter S. Guzmana and Kendall R. Lamkeyb

a Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of the Philippines-Los Banos, 4031 College, Laguna, Philippines
b USDA-ARS, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA, 50011 USA

krlamkey{at}iastate.edu

Use of adequate effective population size in maize (Zea mays L.) recurrent selection programs is important because of random genetic drift and inbreeding depression. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the performance of the BS11 Cycle 0 (C0) and the BS11 Cycle 5 (C5) populations from four S1-progeny selection programs each with a different effective population size (5, 10, 20, or 30) but with a common selection intensity of 20%, and (ii) compare the additive genetic variance among the C0 and C5 populations. Five cycles of selection were conducted by intermating 5, 10, 20, or 30 lines. One hundred thirty C5 S1 lines from each of the selected populations (i.e., C5–5, C5–10, C5–20, and C5–30) and 100 C0 S1 lines were topcrossed to BS11 C0. The resulting half-sib progenies were evaluated at five environments in a replications-within-sets incomplete block design. The four selection programs resulted in significant increases in grain yield, reduced grain moisture, and reduced root and stalk lodging. For yield, the 10-S1 program showed the highest gain cycle-1 of 0.16 Mg ha-1 followed by the 30-S1 program with 0.13 Mg ha-1 cycle-1. The 5-S1 program had a higher gain cycle-1 than the 20-S1 program. The additive genetic variance for yield did not change significantly. Heritability for yield was highest for C5–20, but no significant differences were observed among populations. These results suggest little to no advantage of using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short-term recurrent selection.

Abbreviations: BSSS, Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic • A x E, additive x environment • GDU, growing degree units




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Bernardo, L. Moreau, and A. Charcosset
Number and Fitness of Selected Individuals in Marker-Assisted and Phenotypic Recurrent Selection
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1972 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. A. Tabanao and R. Bernardo
Genetic Variation in Maize Breeding Populations with Different Numbers of Parents
Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2301 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. L. Carson
Mate choice theory and the mode of selection in sexual populations
PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6584 - 6587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.