Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouchez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bouchez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bouchez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Crop Science 40:23-29 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Efficiency of the Use of Doubled-Haploids in Recurrent Selection for Combining Ability

A. Boucheza and A. Gallaisb,c

a INRA-UPS-INA.PG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France
b INA.PG, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75321 Paris Cedex 05, France
c INRA-UPS-INA.PG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France

bouchez{at}mons.inra.fr

In population improvement for combining ability, the use of selfed progenies increases genetic advance per cycle, but it can unduly increase the cycle length. Haplodiploidization (HD) can be very efficient because it induces complete homozygosity in a short period. We compared, from a theoretical approach, the potential of recurrent selection with a tester using doubled haploids (SDHT), with selection with testcrosses of S0, S1, or S2 plants, with or without the use of off-season nurseries, for an annual plant like maize (Zea mays L.). With the same selection intensity, and without off-season nurseries, SDHT with a 4-yr cycle is the most efficient method. Efficiency increases with lower heritability, with an advantage in comparison to the test of S0 plants (S0T) of 40 to 50% at low heritability (h2 < 0.15) and 12% at high heritability (h2 = 0.8). Use of off-season nurseries reduces the advantage of SDHT. With a 3-yr cycle, SDHT remains the best at low heritability with a gain of 27% (for h2 = 0.1) in comparison to S0T with a 2-yr cycle. When using constant effective size, the advantage of SDHT is further reduced or suppressed at the benefit of S0T in 2 yr. The use of HD in recurrent selection for combining ability has its biggest advantage when heritability is low. Consideration of variety development will give more advantage to HD.

Abbreviations: HD, haplodiploidization • SDHT, single-doubled-haploid descent recurrent selection for combining ability with a tester • S0T, S1T, S2T, recurrent selection for combining ability with a tester with respectively S0, S1, S2 plants




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. Gallais
Full-Sib Reciprocal Recurrent Selection with the Use of Doubled Haploids
Crop Sci., January 28, 2009; 49(1): 150 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. A. Gordillo and H. H. Geiger
Alternative Recurrent Selection Strategies Using Doubled Haploid Lines in Hybrid Maize Breeding
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 911 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. Gallais and J. Bordes
The Use of Doubled Haploids in Recurrent Selection and Hybrid Development in Maize
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-190 - S-201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.