Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juskiw, P.E.
Right arrow Articles by Salmon, D.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Juskiw, P.E.
Right arrow Articles by Salmon, D.F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Juskiw, P.E.
Right arrow Articles by Salmon, D.F.
Crop Science 40:138-147 (2000)
© 2000 Crop Science Society of America

CROP ECOLOGY, PRODUCTION, & MANAGEMENT

Forage Yield and Quality for Monocrops and Mixtures of Small Grain Cereals

P.E. Juskiwa, J.H. Helma and D.F. Salmona

a Field Crop Development Centre, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 5030 50th Street, Lacombe, AB, T4L 1W8, Canada

patricia.juskiw{at}agric.gov.ab.ca

Cereals are an important substrate for silage production in the short growing season of the northern Prairies. Our objectives were to determine the effects of seeding rate, species, and harvest date on the forage yield and quality of cereals. Three field studies were conducted to evaluate the productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), triticale (x Triticosecale rimpaui Wittm.), and rye (Secale cereale L.) grown as monocrops or in various mixtures. Seeding rates ranged from 250 to 750 seeds m-2. Harvest times were based on the maturity of the principal cereal in each mixture. Few effects of seeding rate on yield or quality were found, but when effects were found, higher seeding rates were associated with higher yields, lower moisture content, and higher fiber content. All treatments produced high quality forage as measured by neutral detergent fiber (NDF), from 515 g kg-1 for early-harvested tests to 656 g kg-1 for late-harvested tests, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, from 310 g kg-1 for early-harvested tests to 387 g kg-1 for late-harvested tests. Protein was low, ranging from 61.5 to 101.0 g kg-1. Biomass yields ranged from 10.1 to 16.5 Mg ha-1 in the barley cultivar tests, 7.0 to 18.5 Mg ha-1 in the spring cereal tests, and 10.8 to 12.2 Mg ha-1 in the winter cereal tests. Although, some exceptions occurred, forage yield and quality of cereal mixtures were generally intermediate to monocrop production, especially for moisture and fiber content, suggesting that planting species mixtures could extend the harvest period and result in higher-quality silage.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • A/E, actual/expected yield ratio • DM, dry matter • Im, yield of the mixture • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • NIR, near infrared reflectance • On, yield of the monocrop




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. M. Strydhorst, J. R. King, K. J. Lopetinsky, and K. N. Harker
Forage Potential of Intercropping Barley with Faba Bean, Lupin, or Field Pea
Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 182 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. M. Ross, J. R. King, J. T. O'Donovan, and D. Spaner
Intercropping Berseem Clover with Barley and Oat Cultivars for Forage
Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1719 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. M. Ross, J. R. King, J. T. O'Donovan, and D. Spaner
Forage Potential of Intercropping Berseem Clover with Barley, Oat, or Triticale
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1013 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. M. Carr, R. D. Horsley, and W. W. Poland
Barley, Oat, and Cereal-Pea Mixtures as Dryland Forages in the Northern Great Plains
Agron. J., May 1, 2004; 96(3): 677 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. Macoon, K. R. Woodard, L. E. Sollenberger, E. C. French III, K. M. Portier, D. A. Graetz, G. M. Prine, and H. H. Van Horn Jr.
Dairy Effluent Effects on Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Forage Cropping Systems
Agron. J., September 1, 2002; 94(5): 1043 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P.E. Juskiw, J.H. Helm, and D.F. Salmon
Postheading Biomass Distribution for Monocrops and Mixtures of Small Grain Cereals
Crop Sci., January 1, 2000; 40(1): 148 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P.E. Juskiw, J.H. Helm, and D.F. Salmon
Competitive Ability in Mixtures of Small Grain Cereals
Crop Sci., January 1, 2000; 40(1): 159 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Crop Science Society of America.