Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 39:1722-1727 (1999)
© 1999 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, V.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verma, V.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Verma, V.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Crop Science 39:1722-1727 (1999)
© 1999 Crop Science Society of America

CELL BIOLOGY & MOLECULAR GENETICS

Maize Genotypes Show Striking Differences for Induction and Regeneration of Haploid Wheat Embryos in the Wheat x Maize System

Vinesh Vermaa, N.S. Bainsa, G.S. Mangata, G.S. Nandaa, S.S. Gosala and Kuldeep Singha

a Dep. Plant Breeding, Punjab Agric. Univ., Ludhiana 141 004, India

kuldeep{at}pau.chd.nic.in

A number of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes were tested for their influence on induction and regeneration of haploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) embryos to improve further the efficiency of the wheat x maize system of haploid production. Fifteen maize genotypes were crossed to five diverse wheat F1 hybrids in a line x tester fashion in three replications. Two efficiency parameters, caryopses formation frequency (CFF—number of caryopses/100 pollinated florets) and embryo formation frequency (EFF—number of embryo-carrying caryopses/100 pollinated florets), were estimated. Analysis of variance revealed that lines (wheat genotypes), testers (maize genotypes), and their interaction showed significant effects on both efficiency parameters, but the effect of maize genotypes was greater than that of wheat genotypes. The EFF of individual maize genotypes ranged from 1.1 to 23.4% and the EFF of individual wheat genotypes ranged from 8.4 to 10.2%. Maize genotypes also showed significant differences for general combining ability estimates. In addition to EFF, maize genotypes had a striking effect on haploid embryo regeneration as analyzed using one of the wheat genotypes. The values ranged from 0.0 to 87.8%. For maize genotypes producing the highest EFFs, the regeneration frequency was not necessarily higher. Hence, we suggest a new index, haploid formation efficiency (HFE—number of haploid plants formed /100 pollinated florets), be used for identification of efficient pollinators. The HFE ranged from 0.0 to 9.9%. In this study, a pop corn cultivar, Pearl Pop Corn, was identified as the best pollinator with an average EFF of 15.1% across five wheat genotypes and an HFE of 9.9% with the one wheat genotype tested.

Abbreviations: CFF, caryopses formation frequency • EFF, embryo formation frequency • HRF, haploid regeneration frequency • HFE, haploid formation efficiency • GCA, general combining ability







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Crop Science Society of America.